Pliim VS MediumEditor

• Ease of Use
  Pliim offers a simple and user-friendly interface that allows users to quickly enable presentation mode with just a click.
• Distraction-Free Presentations
  By hiding desktop icons, muting notifications, and disabling apps, Pliim helps create a clean and distraction-free environment during presentations.
• Open Source
  As an open-source tool, Pliim allows developers to contribute to its improvement or customize it for specific needs.
• Lightweight
  Pliim is a lightweight application that doesn't consume significant system resources, ensuring smooth operation during presentations.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited to macOS
  Pliim is designed for macOS users, which limits its availability to those using other operating systems.
• Basic Functionality
  While effective for simple needs, Pliim lacks advanced features found in more comprehensive presentation tools.
• Dependence on Third-Party Applications
  Certain functionalities, like disabling specific apps, might depend on external settings or require user intervention.

• User-Friendly Interface
  MediumEditor provides a minimalist and clean interface that allows users to focus on content creation without being overwhelmed by options and buttons.
• Customizable Toolbar
  The editor allows customization of its toolbar, enabling developers to tailor the set of buttons and actions according to the specific needs of their application.
• Extensible and Modular
  MediumEditor is designed to be easily extended with plugins or customizations, offering flexibility for developers who need more than the built-in features.
• Rich Text Editing
  It supports a variety of rich text formatting options such as bold, italic, headings, and lists, providing a comprehensive set of tools for text editing.
• Open Source
  Being open source means it is maintained by a community of developers, offering transparency and a platform for contributions and improvements.
• Lightweight
  MediumEditor is relatively lightweight compared to other rich text editors, which can lead to faster load times and better performance on web applications.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Advanced Features
  Compared to more comprehensive editors, MediumEditor lacks some advanced features such as table editing and complex media embedding.
• Community Support
  While it is open source, the level of community support and frequency of updates can vary, which might pose challenges when needing quick resolutions to issues.
• Browser Compatibility
  Although it functions well on modern browsers, there might be compatibility issues or inconsistencies with certain legacy browsers.
• No Built-in File Management
  MediumEditor does not include built-in file or image management, requiring developers to implement their own handling solutions.
• Learning Curve for Customization
  Developers may face a learning curve when trying to make advanced customizations or develop new plugins due to the need to understand the codebase and API.

Tracking Pliim since Mar 2021.

• WYSIWYG editor for a new Rails project

  The MediumEditor clone looks great, but I wanted a traditional toolbar and the last commit it seems was 3+ years ago. Source: almost 3 years ago

• 6 steps to create a Chrome Extension using Angular

  Writing a text editor from scratch is Pain in the A (Please don’t ask what is A 😉). So instead of writing the text editor, I’m using already available ones **Medium-editor**. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago