Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Please VS tup

Compare Please VS tup and see what are their differences

Please logo Please

A Cross-Language Build System

tup logo tup

Tup is a file-based build system for Linux, OSX, and Windows.
  • Please Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • tup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

Please features and specs

  • Performance
    Please build offers high performance build speeds, which can significantly reduce build times compared to other tools. This is achieved through parallel execution and efficient incremental builds.
  • Flexibility
    Please is highly configurable and flexible, allowing developers to tailor the build system to fit a wide range of project requirements and workflows.
  • Cross-platform
    It supports cross-platform builds, enabling developers to use a single build system for projects targeting multiple operating systems.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    Please requires minimal external dependencies, which simplifies setup and reduces the potential for version conflicts and other dependency-related issues.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Please allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a collaborative community environment.

Possible disadvantages of Please

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find Please build's configuration and scripting style challenging to learn, especially if they are not familiar with build systems.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established build tools, Please has a smaller ecosystem, which might result in fewer plugins, integrations, and community resources.
  • Complex Configuration
    For certain projects, the configuration might become complex, requiring careful management to maintain readability and manageability of build scripts.
  • Less Popular
    Please is not as widely adopted as some other build systems, potentially leading to fewer examples and support resources available online.

tup features and specs

  • Speed
    Tup is designed to be fast by minimizing the overhead typical in other build systems. It efficiently tracks dependencies and only rebuilds what is necessary.
  • Automatic Dependency Detection
    Tup automatically detects dependencies between source files, which reduces the need for manually specifying them and decreases the chances of human error.
  • Parallel Execution
    Tup takes advantage of parallelism to build multiple targets simultaneously, which can significantly reduce build times, especially on multi-core systems.
  • Incremental Builds
    By tracking dependencies accurately, Tup supports incremental builds, which saves time by only rebuilding parts of the project that have changed.
  • Simple Configuration
    The configuration files (Tupfiles) are generally simpler and less verbose compared to makefiles, making them easier to write and maintain.

Possible disadvantages of tup

  • Platform Limitations
    Tup is primarily focused on Linux and similar systems, which could limit its usability in projects that need to support other operating systems like Windows.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to more established build systems like Make or CMake, Tup has a smaller community and fewer resources available for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Complexity for Large Projects
    For very large or complex projects, the simplicity of Tupfiles might not be sufficient, and workarounds or complex solutions might be needed to manage the build process.
  • Limited IDE Support
    Tup is not as widely supported by integrated development environments (IDEs) as other build systems, which could be a drawback for developers who rely on these tools for their workflow.
  • Learning Curve
    Although simpler to write, moving from a more traditional build system to Tup requires learning a new set of commands and ways of defining build logic.

Please videos

Chinese March: ่ฏทไฝ ๆฃ€้˜… - Please Review

More videos:

  • Review - Hong Kong March: ่ฏทไฝ ๆฃ€้˜… - Please Review (Instrumental)
  • Review - ่ฏทไฝ ๆฃ€้˜… (March ยซPlease, reviewยป)

tup videos

The Nitecore TUP Flashlight: The Full Nick Shabazz Review

More videos:

  • Review - Nitecore TUP Review- Best Keychain EDC Flashlight? (1000 Lumens)
  • Review - Nitecore TUP All-Time Favorite EDC Flashlight

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Please and tup)
Action
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Front End Package Manager
Adventure
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Please and tup. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, tup should be more popular than Please. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Please mentions (12)

  • What I wish I knew about Python when I started
    Pip is a command line package manager that comes with Python, but it is definitely not the only package manager. Other tools like pipenv, poetry, pdm, conda, and even some third-party applications like please can all manage Python dependencies. One common mistake beginners make is installing Python, and then running pip install (or even worse, sudo pip install), before moving forward. While this works in the... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top programming languages created in the 2010's on GitHub by stars
    Iโ€™m not sure a JS library qualifies as a PL. Or automation software (SoftStack). Or an API description language. Or a build system. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Just Use a Monorepo
    Regarding your first point, a good alternative to Bazel is [Please][https://please.build/] - its build graph can solve exactly this problem in CI. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Need to know about various distributed build tools available
    Checkout: https://please.build/ - CMake is not directly supported, but you can easily extend please.build to invoke cmake commands to build your targets. - It does supports both Windows(ehweee) and Linux - MIT - BONUS: it is fast. Really fast(||)! Single binary. It is also versatile. I am using it to build a repo with multiple programming languages(C++(Wasm),Go,Js, Flutter), while spinning up vagrant and... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • When to Use Bazel?
    > the best way forward is to take the ideas of Bazel (hermetic and deterministic builds) and package them as a good small build system, perhaps even compatible with Bazel so you don't have to rewrite build rules all the time. How does https://please.build measure up? - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

tup mentions (23)

  • Show HN: A statically typed, cross-platform, easily bootstrappable build system
    The arrows don't go up...? https://gittup.org/tup/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • A Makefile formatter (50 years overdue)
    Tup. https://gittup.org/tup/ https://gittup.org/tup/make_vs_tup.html But the Internetโ€™s make mind-share means you still have to know make. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Learn Makefiles
    Does anyone have experience with tup? https://gittup.org/tup/ It is a build system that automatically determines dependencies based on file system access, so it can work with any kind of compiler/tool. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • The Success and Failure of Ninja (2020)
    Sounds like https://gittup.org/tup/ to me. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Hancho โ€“ A simple and pleasant build system in ~500 lines of Python
    Whenever looking at one these, I think back to the obscure but interesting "tup": โ€œHow is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up.โ€ https://gittup.org/tup/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Please and tup, you can also consider the following products

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Eyes โ€“ The Horror Game - Eyes โ€“ The Horror Game is an Action-Adventure, Horror, 1st-person Exploration and Single-player video game by Paulina Pabis and Michel Pabis.

CAKE - CAKE provides a SaaS-based solution for advertisers, publishers and networks to track, attribute and optimize their spend in real-time.

Terror Lab - Terror Lab is an Indie Action-Adventure, Horror, Exploration and Single-player video game developed by Nicolas Bernard and published by Microids Indie.

waf - Waf is a Python-based framework for configuring, compiling and installing applications.