GNU Make VS Please

• Portability
  GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
• Dependency Management
  It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
• Open Source
  Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
• Wide Adoption
  It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
• Efficiency
  GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Syntax
  The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
• Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
  While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
• Steep Learning Curve
  Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
• Debugging Difficulty
  Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
• Performance Bottlenecks
  For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

• Performance
  Please build offers high performance build speeds, which can significantly reduce build times compared to other tools. This is achieved through parallel execution and efficient incremental builds.
• Flexibility
  Please is highly configurable and flexible, allowing developers to tailor the build system to fit a wide range of project requirements and workflows.
• Cross-platform
  It supports cross-platform builds, enabling developers to use a single build system for projects targeting multiple operating systems.
• Minimal Dependencies
  Please requires minimal external dependencies, which simplifies setup and reduces the potential for version conflicts and other dependency-related issues.
• Open Source
  As an open-source tool, Please allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a collaborative community environment.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New users might find Please build's configuration and scripting style challenging to learn, especially if they are not familiar with build systems.
• Limited Ecosystem
  Compared to more established build tools, Please has a smaller ecosystem, which might result in fewer plugins, integrations, and community resources.
• Complex Configuration
  For certain projects, the configuration might become complex, requiring careful management to maintain readability and manageability of build scripts.
• Less Popular
  Please is not as widely adopted as some other build systems, potentially leading to fewer examples and support resources available online.

No analysis of Please yet.

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Chinese March: 请你检阅 - Please Review

More videos

Tracking GNU Make since Mar 2021.

• What I wish I knew about Python when I started

  Pip is a command line package manager that comes with Python, but it is definitely not the only package manager. Other tools like pipenv, poetry, pdm, conda, and even some third-party applications like please can all manage Python... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Top programming languages created in the 2010's on GitHub by stars

  I’m not sure a JS library qualifies as a PL. Or automation software (SoftStack). Or an API description language. Or a build system. Source: over 3 years ago

• Just Use a Monorepo

  Regarding your first point, a good alternative to Bazel is [Please][https://please.build/] - its build graph can solve exactly this problem in CI. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more