Please VS GNU Make

• Performance
  Please build offers high performance build speeds, which can significantly reduce build times compared to other tools. This is achieved through parallel execution and efficient incremental builds.
• Flexibility
  Please is highly configurable and flexible, allowing developers to tailor the build system to fit a wide range of project requirements and workflows.
• Cross-platform
  It supports cross-platform builds, enabling developers to use a single build system for projects targeting multiple operating systems.
• Minimal Dependencies
  Please requires minimal external dependencies, which simplifies setup and reduces the potential for version conflicts and other dependency-related issues.
• Open Source
  As an open-source tool, Please allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a collaborative community environment.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New users might find Please build's configuration and scripting style challenging to learn, especially if they are not familiar with build systems.
• Limited Ecosystem
  Compared to more established build tools, Please has a smaller ecosystem, which might result in fewer plugins, integrations, and community resources.
• Complex Configuration
  For certain projects, the configuration might become complex, requiring careful management to maintain readability and manageability of build scripts.
• Less Popular
  Please is not as widely adopted as some other build systems, potentially leading to fewer examples and support resources available online.

• Portability
  GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
• Dependency Management
  It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
• Open Source
  Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
• Wide Adoption
  It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
• Efficiency
  GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Syntax
  The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
• Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
  While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
• Steep Learning Curve
  Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
• Debugging Difficulty
  Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
• Performance Bottlenecks
  For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

No analysis of Please yet.

Chinese March: 请你检阅 - Please Review

More videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• What I wish I knew about Python when I started

  Pip is a command line package manager that comes with Python, but it is definitely not the only package manager. Other tools like pipenv, poetry, pdm, conda, and even some third-party applications like please can all manage Python... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Top programming languages created in the 2010's on GitHub by stars

  I’m not sure a JS library qualifies as a PL. Or automation software (SoftStack). Or an API description language. Or a build system. Source: over 3 years ago

• Just Use a Monorepo

  Regarding your first point, a good alternative to Bazel is [Please][https://please.build/] - its build graph can solve exactly this problem in CI. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking GNU Make since Mar 2021.