Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Play Framework VS CodeBehind Framework

Compare Play Framework VS CodeBehind Framework and see what are their differences

Play Framework logo Play Framework

An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.

CodeBehind Framework logo CodeBehind Framework

CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.
  • Play Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-23
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (razor syntax)
    Only view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (standard syntax)
    Only view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (razor syntax)
    MVC view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (standard syntax)
    MVC view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC model
    MVC model //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC controller
    MVC controller //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Return template
    Return template //
    2023-12-25

CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports standard syntax and Razor syntax. This framework guarantees the separation of server-side codes from the design part (html) and there is no need to write server-side codes in the view.

Code Behind framework inherits every advantage of ASP.NET Core and gives it more simplicity, power and flexibility.

CodeBehind framework is an alternative to ASP.NET Core.

Play Framework features and specs

  • Scalability
    The Play Framework is built with scalability in mind, making it easier to develop applications that can handle a large number of simultaneous users and requests.
  • Reactive Programming
    Play is based on a reactive programming model, which allows it to handle asynchronous tasks efficiently. This results in better performance and resource utilization.
  • Hot Reloading
    Play supports hot reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without needing to restart the server. This feature boosts productivity by speeding up the development cycle.
  • Java and Scala Support
    The framework supports both Java and Scala, accommodating a wide range of developers and allowing teams to choose their preferred language.
  • Built-in Testing
    Play has built-in support for writing unit and functional tests, offering a comprehensive test framework to ensure code quality and reliability.
  • RESTful by Default
    Play makes it straightforward to build RESTful web services, simplifying the construction of APIs and ensuring that they adhere to REST principles.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The Play Framework boasts extensive and detailed documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages of Play Framework

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might find Play’s reactive model and functional programming concepts challenging, especially if they are primarily experienced with traditional web frameworks.
  • Memory Usage
    Play applications can be memory-intensive, which might lead to higher hosting costs compared to lighter frameworks, especially for smaller applications.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring a Play application can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for beginners or small teams without extensive experience.
  • Limited Community Support
    Although Play has a dedicated user base, its community is smaller compared to more popular web frameworks like Spring or Django, potentially making it difficult to find solutions and community-driven resources.
  • Verbose Code
    Play applications may require a significant amount of boilerplate code, particularly when integrating with other services or libraries, leading to potentially verbose and less maintainable codebases.

CodeBehind Framework features and specs

  • RAD
    Development is fast with the Code Behind framework.
  • Fast
    The CodeBehind framework is faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
  • Simple
    Developing with CodeBehind is very simple. You can use mvc pattern or model-view or controller-view or only view.
  • Modular
    It is modular. Just copy the new project files, including dll and aspx, into the current active project.
  • Get output
    You can call the output of the aspx page in another aspx page and modify its output.
  • Under .NET Core
    Your project will still be under ASP.NET Core and you will benefit from all the benefits of .NET Core.
  • Code-Behind
    Code-Behind pattern will be fully respected.
  • Modern
    CodeBehind is a modern framework with revolutionary ideas.

Play Framework videos

The Play Framework at LinkedIn: Productivity and Performance at Scale

CodeBehind Framework videos

No CodeBehind Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Play Framework and CodeBehind Framework)
Web Frameworks
58 58%
42% 42
Developer Tools
51 51%
49% 49
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Python Web Framework
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Play Framework and CodeBehind Framework.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer:

The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.

What makes your product unique?

CodeBehind Framework's answer:

The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.

What's the story behind your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer:

The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CodeBehind Framework's answer:

CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.

User comments

Share your experience with using Play Framework and CodeBehind Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Play Framework and CodeBehind Framework

Play Framework Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Play Framework brings Scala and Java into harmony, offering a backstage pass to simplistic, asynchronous web development. No song and dance, just straightforward high-octane performance.
17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
The Play Framework makes it possible to build lightweight and web-friendly Java and Scala applications for desktop and mobile. Play is a hugely popular framework, used by brands such as LinkedIn, Samsung, Walmart, The Guardian, Verizon, and many others.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Play is written using Scala Programming Language. It offers web and mobile application development. It follows MVC architecture. Play is compiled to Java-Bytecode, and this makes Play one of the most powerful frameworks.

CodeBehind Framework Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeBehind Framework yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeBehind Framework should be more popular than Play Framework. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Play Framework mentions (1)

  • Examples of CompletableFuture-based APIs / state of async in Java?
    I can see the Play framework really leans into async, and only tolerates blocking controllers. What else is out there? Source: over 1 year ago

CodeBehind Framework mentions (3)

  • ASP.NET Core New BackEnd Framework! CodeBehind 2.5 Released
    CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • How to Load Controller Class From Another DLL?
    As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • CodeBehind 2.1; aspx Back to ASP.NET Core
    CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Play Framework and CodeBehind Framework, you can also consider the following products

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

Adonis JS - AdonisJs is a Node.js web framework with breath of fresh air and drizzle of elegant syntax on top of it

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple