
Conda
Homebrew
Yay
Portage
Nix
Docker
BBEdit
pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.

RegDossier.eu
ComplianceAgent
SetAIComply
AI Act Directory
OneTrust
Vanta
GDPR.EU
Free EU AI Act risk check for founders. Answer 32 questions about your AI product and get a personalised gap report: your risk tier, which Articles apply to your role, obligations with the correct post-Omnibus deadlines, and a prioritised fix list.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, pkgsrc seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pkgsrc.org | reglynn.eu |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Poland · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of pkgsrc yet.
Reglynn turns the EU AI Act into a decision you can act on. Most founders don't ignore the AI Act — they can't tell whether it applies to them. Finding out costs €300/hour, and free tools hand you a risk tier with no reasoning behind it. Reglynn asks 32 questions about what your AI system does,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
pkgsrc on ChromeOS
More videos
No Reglynn.eu videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing pkgsrc and Reglynn.eu.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
Three things. It uses the correct post-Omnibus deadlines — most published guidance still carries the pre-June-2026 dates, which tells high-risk providers they're late when they aren't, and tells chatbot builders they have time when they don't. It runs the Article 6(3) exemption check, which almost no free tool does, so it won't tell you you're high-risk when the regulation says otherwise. And it publishes its own AI Act self-assessment, because Reglynn is an AI system under the regulation it assesses.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
Free checkers give you a risk tier with no reasoning. Enterprise GRC platforms give you a subscription starting in the tens of thousands. A lawyer gives you an answer at €300/hour. Reglynn gives you a dated, structured document you can put in front of an enterprise procurement team — once, for €59.
It also works hard not to over-classify you. The report runs role, then GPAI, then the Article 6(3) exemption, then establishment, in that order, because assigning someone else's obligations to a deployer is what makes these tools useless.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
Founders, product managers and operations leads at EU or EU-serving companies with 5–50 people who ship an AI feature — chatbots, generative products, scoring or ranking models, AI-assisted screening. Typically the trigger is an enterprise prospect's legal team asking for their AI Act position in writing, with a deadline attached. Not lawyers, and not enterprises with a compliance department.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
After the June 2026 Omnibus, the coverage said "the EU delayed the AI Act." That's half true, and it's the reassuring half. High-risk obligations moved to December 2027 — but Article 50 transparency duties were never deferred, and regulators gained fining powers on 2 August 2026.
So the group with live obligations right now is precisely the group that read "delayed" and stopped paying attention. Reglynn was built to close that gap for companies that can't put €300/hour behind finding out.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
A static site on Netlify. Assessment through structured forms, with report generation via Anthropic's Claude API against Reglynn's own question set and classification logic. Delivery logging in Airtable. Analytics via GA4 with Consent Mode v2, denied by default.
Reglynn.eu's answer:
Reglynn launched in August 2026 and doesn't publish customer names. Buyers are typically 10–50 person AI companies responding to an enterprise procurement or due-diligence request.
Share your experience with using pkgsrc and Reglynn.eu. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


As a NetBSD user, I would guess it is for use with pkgsrc. That would be great for mac people if my wild guess is correct. http://pkgsrc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
> Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Tracking Reglynn.eu since Aug 2026.
When comparing pkgsrc and Reglynn.eu, you can also consider the following products.

Eight free EU compliance tools. NIS2 applicability, AI Act risk and fines, DORA assessment, deadline tracker. Article-level citations, no signup.
Compare RegDossier.eu to pkgsrc or Reglynn.eu:


Free EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Checker — five plain-language questions, instant deterministic result. No account, nothing stored.
Compare ComplianceAgent to pkgsrc or Reglynn.eu:

Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.
Compare Yay to pkgsrc or Reglynn.eu:

AI-Act-native compliance for European SMEs — classify AI systems, generate Annex IV docs, and stay compliant in 24 EU languages. Self-serve, from €0.
Compare SetAIComply to pkgsrc or Reglynn.eu: