PingPlotter VS mtr

• Detailed Network Diagnostics
  PingPlotter provides advanced network diagnostics by visualizing latency and packet loss over time, helping identify problematic areas in the network.
• Historical Data
  The tool allows users to save and review historical data, which is invaluable for troubleshooting intermittent network issues that are not easily reproducible.
• Ease of Use
  PingPlotter offers an easy-to-use interface that makes it accessible even for users who aren't network experts, allowing them to quickly start diagnosing issues.
• Customizable Alerts
  Users can set up customizable alerts to notify them when latency or packet loss exceeds certain thresholds, providing timely insights into network performance issues.
• Multi-Platform Support
  PingPlotter is available on Windows, Mac, and iOS, which offers flexibility for different types of users and environments.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  PingPlotter is not free, and the cost can be prohibitive for individuals or small businesses, especially for the Pro version which offers more advanced features.
• Resource Intensive
  Running PingPlotter for extended periods can consume significant system resources, which might be a concern for users with lower-end hardware.
• Limited Free Version
  The free version of PingPlotter has limited functionality, which may not be sufficient for diagnosing more complex network issues.
• Learning Curve
  While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and data interpretation can have a learning curve, requiring users to invest time to fully utilize the tool.
• No Linux Support
  PingPlotter does not support Linux, which can be a drawback for network administrators working in a Linux-dominated environment.

• Real-time Network Diagnostics
  MTR (My Traceroute) provides real-time statistics on the network path, including packet loss and latency, which helps in diagnosing network issues promptly.
• Combination of Ping and Traceroute
  MTR combines the functionalities of both ping and traceroute, allowing for comprehensive analysis by showing the route and performance metrics for each hop along the path.
• Continuous Monitoring
  Unlike traditional traceroute that runs once, MTR continuously sends packets, providing ongoing updates on the network status, which helps in identifying intermittent issues.
• Visualization Options
  MTR includes both console-based and GUI-based interfaces, catering to different user preferences and making it easier to visualize the network performance.
• Cross-Platform Availability
  MTR is available on multiple operating systems including Linux, BSD variants, and macOS, ensuring that it can be used in various environments.

Possible disadvantages

• Potential Overhead
  Continuous monitoring by MTR can add network overhead, especially in congested networks, possibly impacting performance.
• Security Concerns
  Using MTR might pose security risks, as it continuously sends packets to remote hosts. This can be exploited to perform network reconnaissance or be flagged by security systems.
• Requires Administrative Privileges
  Running MTR typically requires administrative or root privileges, which may not be available in all environments or may pose security risks if improperly managed.
• Limited Network Layer Support
  MTR primarily functions at the IP layer and might not provide insights into application-specific issues or issues at different OSI layers, limiting its diagnostic capabilities for complex problems.
• Dependency on External Conditions
  The accuracy and usefulness of MTR reports can be affected by variables like network congestion, traffic shaping, and firewall rules, which can lead to misleading conclusions about network health.

Analyzing PingPlotter Data

More videos

35" Goodyear MTR Tire Review | Jeep TJ

More videos

• Understanding missed attestations, understanding low effectiveness and improving your setup

  Once you have those in place, there is little more you can do to help. There might be some marginal benefits in connecting with more peers at the cost of higher resources usage, especially bandwidth. Under normal circumstances, the... Source: about 4 years ago

• Packet Loss with PingPlotter

  I'm attempting to use PingPlotter to find the problem but I'm fairly new with it - The Packet Loss is occurring on IP 192.168.1.1 while testing 8.8.8.8, pingman.com, google.com, akamai.com however it does not show any PL for www.google.com. Source: almost 5 years ago

• Show HN: How did YOUR computer reach my server?

  Interesting, I didn't know traceroute used UDP by default. Just did some testing with the best traceroute tool, mtr[0], and using the -u flag for UDP seemed to give the worst results. -t for TCP seemed OK. I never thought about the... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago