Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PingPlotter VS FingerprintJS

Compare PingPlotter VS FingerprintJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PingPlotter logo PingPlotter

PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

FingerprintJS logo FingerprintJS

Fraud detection and prevention using browser fingerprinting with 99.5% accuracy. Stops account sharing, payment processing fraud and gaming.
  • PingPlotter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-13
  • FingerprintJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-11-28

PingPlotter features and specs

  • Detailed Network Diagnostics
    PingPlotter provides advanced network diagnostics by visualizing latency and packet loss over time, helping identify problematic areas in the network.
  • Historical Data
    The tool allows users to save and review historical data, which is invaluable for troubleshooting intermittent network issues that are not easily reproducible.
  • Ease of Use
    PingPlotter offers an easy-to-use interface that makes it accessible even for users who aren't network experts, allowing them to quickly start diagnosing issues.
  • Customizable Alerts
    Users can set up customizable alerts to notify them when latency or packet loss exceeds certain thresholds, providing timely insights into network performance issues.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    PingPlotter is available on Windows, Mac, and iOS, which offers flexibility for different types of users and environments.

Possible disadvantages of PingPlotter

  • Cost
    PingPlotter is not free, and the cost can be prohibitive for individuals or small businesses, especially for the Pro version which offers more advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running PingPlotter for extended periods can consume significant system resources, which might be a concern for users with lower-end hardware.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of PingPlotter has limited functionality, which may not be sufficient for diagnosing more complex network issues.
  • Learning Curve
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and data interpretation can have a learning curve, requiring users to invest time to fully utilize the tool.
  • No Linux Support
    PingPlotter does not support Linux, which can be a drawback for network administrators working in a Linux-dominated environment.

FingerprintJS features and specs

  • Unique Visitor Identification
    FingerprintJS provides a robust method for uniquely identifying users by generating a fingerprint based on their device and browser configurations. This helps in tracking user activities and preventing fraud without relying on more intrusive methods like cookies.
  • Privacy-Friendly
    Unlike cookies, FingerprintJS offers a way to identify users without storing personally identifiable information on their devices. This helps in maintaining user privacy while still achieving the goal of user identification.
  • Cross-Browser Tracking
    It allows for tracking users across different browsers and even when cookies are cleared, providing a more consistent identification method that is less affected by user actions compared to traditional cookie-based tracking.
  • Open-Source Version
    FingerprintJS offers an open-source version that can be used for free, allowing developers to integrate basic fingerprinting functionalities without incurring costs, which can be beneficial for small projects or startups.
  • Highly Accurate
    By combining multiple data points such as screen resolution, browser plugins, and timezone, FingerprintJS achieves high accuracy in differentiating users, thereby reducing the likelihood of false positives.

Possible disadvantages of FingerprintJS

  • Potential for Device Blocking
    Some users may have browser extensions or settings that actively block fingerprinting attempts, which could lead to incomplete data or inability to track those users effectively.
  • Ethical Concerns
    Even though fingerprinting is less invasive than cookies, it still raises ethical questions regarding user tracking and consent, as many users may not be aware they are being tracked in this way.
  • Performance Overheads
    Implementing FingerprintJS can introduce some performance overhead as the system must collect and process multiple data points to generate a fingerprint, which could affect loading times.
  • Complexity in Implementation
    Integrating FingerprintJS, especially the more advanced features, may require a more significant development effort and understanding of client-side data handling, which could be a barrier for smaller teams or projects.
  • Legal and Compliance Issues
    Depending on regional privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA, using fingerprinting technology may require additional consent from users, leading to legal implications if not handled properly.

Analysis of PingPlotter

Overall verdict

  • PingPlotter is generally regarded as a good choice for network monitoring and troubleshooting, especially for users who need detailed visibility into the performance and health of their network connections.

Why this product is good

  • PingPlotter is considered a reliable network monitoring tool because it provides detailed insights into network performance and helps identify the location and nature of connectivity issues. It offers a user-friendly interface with comprehensive graphical representations of network data, making it easier to diagnose problems. Additionally, it supports both live monitoring and historical data analysis, which is beneficial for ongoing network management.

Recommended for

    PingPlotter is recommended for IT professionals, network administrators, and any users who need to maintain network reliability and optimal performance. It is also suitable for remote workers experiencing connectivity issues and gamers who require low-latency connections.

PingPlotter videos

Analyzing PingPlotter Data

More videos:

  • Review - Use PingPlotter to identify poor QoS or intermittent connectivity issues.
  • Tutorial - How to Use PingPlotter to Dignose Server Network Issues

FingerprintJS videos

Integrations Engineer | Fingerprintjs | Work From Home ๐Ÿก๐Ÿ’ธ| Internet Income Ninja๐Ÿฑโ€๐Ÿ‘ค๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ’ต

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PingPlotter and FingerprintJS)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Fraud Detection And Prevention

User comments

Share your experience with using PingPlotter and FingerprintJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FingerprintJS seems to be a lot more popular than PingPlotter. While we know about 64 links to FingerprintJS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of PingPlotter. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PingPlotter mentions (2)

  • Understanding missed attestations, understanding low effectiveness and improving your setup
    Once you have those in place, there is little more you can do to help. There might be some marginal benefits in connecting with more peers at the cost of higher resources usage, especially bandwidth. Under normal circumstances, the default peers count from your clients should be good. Monitoring Internet quality with tools like those from pingman can help pinpoint the cause of some of these missed attestations if... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Packet Loss with PingPlotter
    I'm attempting to use PingPlotter to find the problem but I'm fairly new with it - The Packet Loss is occurring on IP 192.168.1.1 while testing 8.8.8.8, pingman.com, google.com, akamai.com however it does not show any PL for www.google.com. Source: over 4 years ago

FingerprintJS mentions (64)

  • Precursor
    This (agent detection) is now a kind of emerging space. Obviously it'll get much more important, too. Other products in the space: - Foil (https://usefoil.com/), I'm biased, a friend is building this - Kasada https://www.kasada.io/ - DataDome (https://datadome.co/) - Castle (https://castle.io/) - Fingerprint (https://fingerprint.com/) - HUMAN (http://humansecurity.com/) - Google Cloud Fraud Defense, which is... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
  • EU Member States (and Google) suddenly want to keep cookie banners
    Cookies are not the meta for tracking. Fingerprinting [1] is highly effective across IPs and across incognito/browser profiles. The only browsers I've found that defeat it on desktop are Mullvad and Tor Browser as well as most antidetect browsers. Mullvad (essentially Tor Browser without the Tor network built in for better usability on the web) and Tor browser are blocked from using or signing up for most websites... - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • Show HN: DevicePrint โ€“ device fingerprinting without cookies
    What differentiates this from http://fingerprint.com/? Visited for the first time and it said I already visited 800+ times with a 99.5% accurancy - not very promising. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • The privacy nightmare of browser fingerprinting
    FYI I wouldnโ€™t say that the Mullvad browser is any better at anti-fingerprinting than Librewolf. I always point people to http://fingerprint.com/ so they can see how difficult it is to beat even JS based tracking and this doesnโ€™t even get into the server-side methods (i.e. Just fetching a stylesheet) of tracking users. Thatโ€™s not to say you shouldnโ€™t use a browser that blocks ads etc but I donโ€™t think people... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • The privacy nightmare of browser fingerprinting
    The Tor Browser wonโ€™t effectively stop fingerprinting, if anything it makes you more unique due to the low amount of people worldwide using it, and then you add points of data by using different DNS providers, extensions etc. The Tor Browser as a privacy measure is likely no better than a normal browser with uBlock if youโ€™re also using it like a โ€œnormalโ€ browser, signing into the same accounts you always use etc.... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PingPlotter and FingerprintJS, you can also consider the following products

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

Cover Your Tracks - Cover Your Tracks is a website that comes with an agile approach for the users to test the privacy of add-ons with best-in-class tools and techniques with complete online support.

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

SEON - SEON Sense Platform is a modular and AI-powered fraud detection software that deliver clear results with an automated, machine-driven workflow.

Beyond Compare - Beyond Compare allows you to compare files and folders.

Castle - The easiest way to protect your users from getting hacked