Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Pingnoo VS gping (CLI)

Compare Pingnoo VS gping (CLI) and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

Pingnoo logo Pingnoo

Pingnoo is an open-source Windows, macOS and Linux visual trace route analyser.

gping (CLI) logo gping (CLI)

Ping, but with a graph. Contribute to orf/gping development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Pingnoo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-10
  • gping (CLI) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2026-03-29

Pingnoo features and specs

  • Open Source
    Pingnoo is open source, allowing users to freely access and modify the source code, encouraging community contributions and collaboration.
  • Comprehensive Network Analysis
    It provides detailed information on network latency, helping users to diagnose and troubleshoot network issues effectively.
  • Cross-Platform
    Pingnoo is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    It offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, which simplifies the process of network analysis and makes it more accessible even for beginners.

Possible disadvantages of Pingnoo

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some commercial network monitoring tools, Pingnoo may lack more advanced features such as real-time alerts and detailed network mapping.
  • Reliance on Community Support
    Being an open-source project, it may rely heavily on community support for updates and troubleshooting, which might lead to slower release cycles and response times.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with network analysis tools might face a learning curve when trying to understand the detailed metrics and data provided by Pingnoo.
  • Resource Intensity
    Running continuous network diagnostics might require significant system resources, which could impact performance on lower-end hardware.

gping (CLI) features and specs

  • Visual real-time graphing
    gping provides a real-time, terminal-based graph of ping latency over time, making it easy to visually spot trends, spikes, and packet loss at a glance โ€” something the standard ping command cannot do.
  • Multi-host comparison
    You can ping multiple hosts simultaneously and see their latency graphs side by side in the same terminal window, which is extremely useful for comparing network paths or diagnosing routing issues.
  • Cross-platform support
    gping is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and can be installed via popular package managers like Homebrew, Chocolatey, Scoop, and various Linux package managers, making it accessible on virtually any platform.
  • Simple and intuitive CLI
    The tool is very easy to use with minimal configuration required. Just run 'gping <host>' and you immediately get a useful visual output. The command-line flags are straightforward and well-documented.
  • Supports arbitrary command graphing
    Beyond just pinging hosts, gping can graph the execution time of arbitrary commands using the --cmd flag, making it a versatile tool for monitoring the performance of any repeatable command over time.

Possible disadvantages of gping (CLI)

  • Requires installation of additional binary
    Unlike the standard ping command which is pre-installed on virtually every operating system, gping must be separately downloaded and installed, which may not be feasible in locked-down or minimal server environments.
  • Limited data export and logging
    gping is primarily a visual tool and lacks robust options for exporting ping data to files or structured formats (like CSV or JSON) for later analysis, making it less suitable for long-term monitoring or automated reporting.
  • Terminal size dependency
    The quality and usefulness of the graph depends heavily on terminal window size. In small terminal windows, the graph can become compressed and hard to read, losing much of the visual advantage over standard ping.
  • No alerting or threshold features
    gping does not support configuring alerts or notifications when latency exceeds a certain threshold or packet loss occurs, limiting its usefulness as a proactive monitoring tool compared to dedicated network monitoring solutions.
  • Resource overhead compared to standard ping
    As a graphical TUI application, gping consumes more CPU and memory than the standard ping utility. While generally negligible on modern systems, this can matter on resource-constrained embedded devices or when running many instances.

Analysis of gping (CLI)

Overall verdict

  • gping is an excellent, lightweight open-source CLI tool that modernizes the classic ping command by adding a real-time graphical visualization of latency directly in your terminal, making it a favorite among developers and sysadmins.

Why this product is good

  • Displays ping latency as a live, scrolling graph right in the terminal for easy visual analysis
  • Supports pinging multiple hosts simultaneously and comparing their latency side by side
  • Cross-platform support for Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Written in Rust, making it fast, efficient, and reliable
  • Free and open-source with an active community and simple installation via common package managers
  • Can execute commands and graph their execution time, not just network pings

Recommended for

  • Network engineers and system administrators troubleshooting connectivity or latency issues
  • Developers who want a quick visual sense of network performance
  • Users who need to compare latency across multiple hosts at once
  • Anyone comfortable working in the command line who wants a more informative alternative to traditional ping

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pingnoo and gping (CLI))

Pingnoo

gping (CLI)

Monitoring Tools
54 54%
Monitoring Tools
46% 46
Log Management
54 54%
Log Management
46% 46
OS & Utilities
0 0%
OS & Utilities
100% 100
Network Scanning
100 100%
Network Scanning
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Pingnoo and gping (CLI). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pingnoo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pingnoo mentions (2)

  • Confused and need a little guidance
    All the code for my app is in the repo (https://github.com/nedrysoft/pingnoo). My application is built in a module fashion with plugins (I call them components). The plugin system and theme libraries are in src/libs. Source: about 5 years ago
  • Setting up an open source project
    I specifically list both the open-source and commercial products I use, some of the commercial tools are invaluable to me and often they are bargains for what they offer, even more so when they go on offer. (https://github.com/nedrysoft/pingnoo/#readme). Source: over 5 years ago

gping (CLI) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of gping (CLI) yet. Tracking of gping (CLI) recommendations started around Mar 2026.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pingnoo and gping (CLI), you can also consider the following products

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

Open Visual Traceroute - Open source cross-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac) Java Visual Traceroute, packet sniffer and Whois.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

WinMTR - Free Network Diagnostic Tool. WinMTR is an equivalent of mtr for Windows.

Loading...