PingPlotter VS gping (CLI)

• Detailed Network Diagnostics
  PingPlotter provides advanced network diagnostics by visualizing latency and packet loss over time, helping identify problematic areas in the network.
• Historical Data
  The tool allows users to save and review historical data, which is invaluable for troubleshooting intermittent network issues that are not easily reproducible.
• Ease of Use
  PingPlotter offers an easy-to-use interface that makes it accessible even for users who aren't network experts, allowing them to quickly start diagnosing issues.
• Customizable Alerts
  Users can set up customizable alerts to notify them when latency or packet loss exceeds certain thresholds, providing timely insights into network performance issues.
• Multi-Platform Support
  PingPlotter is available on Windows, Mac, and iOS, which offers flexibility for different types of users and environments.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  PingPlotter is not free, and the cost can be prohibitive for individuals or small businesses, especially for the Pro version which offers more advanced features.
• Resource Intensive
  Running PingPlotter for extended periods can consume significant system resources, which might be a concern for users with lower-end hardware.
• Limited Free Version
  The free version of PingPlotter has limited functionality, which may not be sufficient for diagnosing more complex network issues.
• Learning Curve
  While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and data interpretation can have a learning curve, requiring users to invest time to fully utilize the tool.
• No Linux Support
  PingPlotter does not support Linux, which can be a drawback for network administrators working in a Linux-dominated environment.

• Visual real-time graphing
  gping provides a real-time, terminal-based graph of ping latency over time, making it easy to visually spot trends, spikes, and packet loss at a glance — something the standard ping command cannot do.
• Multi-host comparison
  You can ping multiple hosts simultaneously and see their latency graphs side by side in the same terminal window, which is extremely useful for comparing network paths or diagnosing routing issues.
• Cross-platform support
  gping is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and can be installed via popular package managers like Homebrew, Chocolatey, Scoop, and various Linux package managers, making it accessible on virtually any platform.
• Simple and intuitive CLI
  The tool is very easy to use with minimal configuration required. Just run 'gping <host>' and you immediately get a useful visual output. The command-line flags are straightforward and well-documented.
• Supports arbitrary command graphing
  Beyond just pinging hosts, gping can graph the execution time of arbitrary commands using the --cmd flag, making it a versatile tool for monitoring the performance of any repeatable command over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Requires installation of additional binary
  Unlike the standard ping command which is pre-installed on virtually every operating system, gping must be separately downloaded and installed, which may not be feasible in locked-down or minimal server environments.
• Limited data export and logging
  gping is primarily a visual tool and lacks robust options for exporting ping data to files or structured formats (like CSV or JSON) for later analysis, making it less suitable for long-term monitoring or automated reporting.
• Terminal size dependency
  The quality and usefulness of the graph depends heavily on terminal window size. In small terminal windows, the graph can become compressed and hard to read, losing much of the visual advantage over standard ping.
• No alerting or threshold features
  gping does not support configuring alerts or notifications when latency exceeds a certain threshold or packet loss occurs, limiting its usefulness as a proactive monitoring tool compared to dedicated network monitoring solutions.
• Resource overhead compared to standard ping
  As a graphical TUI application, gping consumes more CPU and memory than the standard ping utility. While generally negligible on modern systems, this can matter on resource-constrained embedded devices or when running many instances.

Analyzing PingPlotter Data

More videos

No gping (CLI) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Understanding missed attestations, understanding low effectiveness and improving your setup

  Once you have those in place, there is little more you can do to help. There might be some marginal benefits in connecting with more peers at the cost of higher resources usage, especially bandwidth. Under normal circumstances, the... Source: about 4 years ago

• Packet Loss with PingPlotter

  I'm attempting to use PingPlotter to find the problem but I'm fairly new with it - The Packet Loss is occurring on IP 192.168.1.1 while testing 8.8.8.8, pingman.com, google.com, akamai.com however it does not show any PL for www.google.com. Source: about 5 years ago

Tracking gping (CLI) since Mar 2026.