Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Papers with Code VS Google Scholar

Compare Papers with Code VS Google Scholar and see what are their differences

Mailpool
Cold Email Infrastructure, Simplified featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Papers with Code logo Papers with Code

The latest in machine learning at your fingerprints

Google Scholar logo Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
  • Papers with Code Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • Google Scholar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07

Papers with Code features and specs

  • Open Access
    Papers with Code provides free access to a vast repository of research papers and code implementations, making cutting-edge research available to a wider audience.
  • Reproducibility
    By linking research papers with their corresponding code, it promotes reproducibility, allowing researchers to verify results and build upon previous work more effectively.
  • Benchmarking
    The platform offers benchmarking tools and leaderboards, facilitating the comparison of different models and approaches on standard datasets and fostering competition in the research community.
  • Community Engagement
    Researchers and developers can contribute their own code and evaluations, which encourages community collaboration and the sharing of knowledge.
  • Resource Saving
    By providing implementations and datasets, it saves researchers time and resources, enabling them to focus on innovation rather than recreating existing work.

Possible disadvantages of Papers with Code

  • Quality Control
    Not all code implementations are thoroughly vetted or peer-reviewed, which can lead to issues with code quality and reliability.
  • Misalignment of Benchmarks
    Benchmarks and evaluations might not perfectly align with certain niche or novel research tasks, potentially skewing perceptions about model performance.
  • Dependence on Contributor Participation
    The platform relies heavily on community contributions; if participation wanes, the updates and breadth of resources could stagnate.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating and adapting third-party code into different environments or existing projects can sometimes be challenging due to dependencies or compatibility issues.
  • Information Overload
    With a vast amount of available papers and code, navigating and finding the most relevant and high-quality resources can be overwhelming for users.

Google Scholar features and specs

  • Accessibility
    Google Scholar is freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, removing barriers to accessing academic research.
  • Wide Range of Sources
    It indexes scholarly articles from a broad range of disciplines and sources, including academic publishers, universities, and other scholarly websites.
  • Citation Tracking
    Google Scholar provides citation information, allowing users to see how often a paper has been cited and to track the influence of research over time.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is user-friendly and familiar to anyone who has used Google, making it easy to search for and find scholarly papers.
  • Advanced Search Options
    Google Scholar offers advanced search capabilities, including the ability to search by author, date range, and specific journals.

Possible disadvantages of Google Scholar

  • Quality Control
    The inclusion criteria for sources indexed are not transparent, leading to variability in the quality of the materials available.
  • Coverage
    Although extensive, Google Scholar's coverage is not comprehensive, and some important journals and articles might be missing.
  • Duplicate Entries
    There can be multiple entries for the same document, making it difficult to determine the most authoritative version.
  • Limited Full-Text Availability
    Many articles listed in Google Scholar are behind paywalls, meaning full access often requires a subscription or purchase.
  • Inconsistent Metadata
    The metadata (author names, publication dates, etc.) can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, affecting search results and citation tracking.

Analysis of Google Scholar

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Google Scholar is considered a good resource for academic research. It is user-friendly, provides comprehensive search results, and includes useful features such as citation analysis and linking to full-text articles when available. However, it may not have access to all subscription-only content available through university libraries or specialized databases.

Why this product is good

  • Google Scholar is a valuable tool because it provides free access to a vast range of scholarly articles, theses, books, conference papers, and patents across various disciplines. It indexes content from academic publishers, research institutions, and other scholarly websites, making it a convenient resource for researchers, students, and academics. Its citation tracking feature is particularly useful for understanding the impact and relevance of specific works.

Recommended for

  • Students looking for scholarly articles for their assignments.
  • Researchers who want to track citations and research trends.
  • Academics needing access to a wide range of publications.
  • Anyone interested in finding reliable, peer-reviewed sources for information.

Papers with Code videos

+ Add

The best site for research papers with codes on Machine/Deep Learning | Research paper search

More videos:

  • Review - Papers With Code Machine Learning Papers and Code Free Resource

Google Scholar videos

+ Add

How to do a literature review using Google Scholar

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use Google Scholar | Writing A Literature Review
  • Tutorial - How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Papers with Code and Google Scholar)

Papers with Code

Google Scholar

AI
100 100%
AI
0% 0
Digital Whiteboard
0 0%
Digital Whiteboard
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
Research Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Papers with Code and Google Scholar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Papers with Code. While we know about 1004 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 100 mentions of Papers with Code. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Papers with Code mentions (100)

  • What does HumaneBench AI benchmark reveal about chatbot safety?
    Benchmark Primary focus Evaluation metrics System coverage Usability Link HumaneBench AI benchmark Human well being, humane AI principles HumaneScore, flip tests under adversarial instruction, long term well being 15 popular chat models tested across 800 realistic scenarios Designed for chatbot safety research; requires ensemble judging for... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Computer Vision Made Simple with ReductStore and Roboflow
    An helpful approach is to browse the state of the art models in paperswithcode. This will give you an idea of the performance of different models on various tasks. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Simple Science โ€“ The Newest Science Explained Simply
    I think a way around this would some sort of voting/ popularity system? Papers with code (https://paperswithcode.com/) does this via Github stars sorting. Sure it doesn't mean something is established. But it at least gives some way to filter through the firehose of papers. Love this project btw! I think it has potential (and the timing is right now that everyone is looking for the next "attention is all... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Essential Deep Learning Checklist: Best Practices Unveiled
    Adapting to Evolving Standards: With the rapid progress in deep learning research and applications, staying current with the latest developments is crucial. The checklist underscores the importance of considering established standard architectures and leveraging current state-of-the-art (SOTA) resources, like paperswithcode.com, to guide project decisions. This dynamic approach ensures that projects benefit from... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Understanding Technical Research Papers
    Papers With Code is one of the good resources to get you to get started. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

Google Scholar mentions (1004)

  • Who discovered grokking and why is the name hard to find?
    Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • AI generated font using nano banana
    Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • ChatGPT Search
    > Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Is Psychology Going to Cincinnati?
    He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Where do you subscribe to published journal topics?
    If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Papers with Code and Google Scholar, you can also consider the following products

ML5.js - Friendly machine learning for the web

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

arXiv - arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Spell - Deep Learning and AI accessible to everyone

Forge - Static web hosting made simple

Loading...