Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Pale Moon VS CloudLinux

Compare Pale Moon VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

Pale Moon

Pale Moon is an Open Source, Mozilla-derived web browser available for Microsoft Windows and Linux, focusing on efficiency and ease of use.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Sable by SubRosa
Sable is a multi-tenant compliance and vendor risk platform for MSPs and growing companies, backed by an in-house security team for pen testing, SOC monitoring and incident response. The platform and the people to act on it. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Pale Moon seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Web Browsers popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Pale Moon
CloudLinux
Website palemoon.org cloudlinux.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
Web Browsers Web Development Tools Customisable Web Browser Security & Privacy +1
Hosting Web Hosting Cloud Hosting VPS Hosting +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Pale Moon 5 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Lightweight
    Pale Moon is designed to be a lightweight browser, which leads to lower memory usage compared to more feature-heavy browsers like Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.
  • Customizable
    The browser allows extensive customization options, from the user interface to various settings, to suit user preference.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Pale Moon prioritizes user privacy and includes a number of features designed to protect user data and reduce tracking.
  • Legacy Add-on Support
    It continues to support many legacy Firefox add-ons that are no longer supported in the latest versions of Firefox.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Pale Moon allows users to review the source code, fostering transparency and community contributions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not display or function correctly because they are optimized for more mainstream browsers.
  • Slower Update Cycle
    Pale Moon's update cycle can be slower compared to more mainstream browsers, potentially delaying important security and feature updates.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    The browser ecosystem, including add-ons and extensions, is less extensive compared to giants like Chrome or Firefox.
  • Fewer Developer Resources
    As a smaller project, Pale Moon has fewer developer resources, which may affect the speed and scope of development and troubleshooting.
  • Less Familiar Interface
    Users accustomed to the interfaces of more mainstream browsers may find Pale Moon's interface less familiar and harder to navigate initially.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Pale Moon
CloudLinux

Overall verdict

  • Pale Moon is generally considered a good browser for users who prioritize speed, simplicity, and customizability over the latest web features. However, some modern web standards may not be fully supported, which can affect the compatibility with some websites.

Why this product is good

  • Pale Moon is a web browser known for being lightweight and customizable. It is based on a fork of older Mozilla Firefox versions, which means it retains a classic interface while offering a higher level of customization. It appeals to users seeking an alternative to mainstream browsers with different design philosophies, who value user privacy and control over features.

Recommended for

    Pale Moon is recommended for users who want a minimalist, efficient browser experience and prefer the older, classic Firefox interface. It is suitable for tech enthusiasts who appreciate open-source software and have a preference for personalization and privacy.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Pale Moon 4 videos + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

A look at the Pale Moon web browser - Battle of the browsers

More videos

  • - Browser wars: Pale Moon vs Firefox ESR [Part 1]
  • - Pale Moon Web Browser
  • - Pale Moon Demo

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Pale Moon
CloudLinux
100% 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0%
0% 0%
Hosting
100% 100%
100% 100%
Customisable Web Browser
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cloud Hosting
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Pale Moon and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Pale Moon no reviews yet
CloudLinux no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CloudLinux yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Pale Moon 6 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • XUL Layout has been removed from Firefox
    The Palemoon browser [0] also still uses XUL, and is in many ways a continuation of XUL browsers (was originally forked from FF 29, updated with various components from FF 50+, and with many other tweaks). [0] https://palemoon.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • All computers are garbage!
    The Pale Moon browser https://palemoon.org/ strikes a pretty good balance, IMO. They forked it from Firefox 24 and focused development narrowly on fixing Firefox's massive backlog of bugs and keeping up with core web standards. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Browser sync—what are the risks of turning it on?
    Or use a browser that unlike Chromezilla browsers just uses a local encryption key for sync that's your responsibility to not forget, so even if their sync server is hacked no one can read your synced data. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Pale Moon and CloudLinux

When comparing Pale Moon and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...