
Satis
Private Packagist
Artifactory
Cloudsmith
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Toran Proxy
PHP private self-hosted Packagist/Composer/Satis repository with unlimited private repos

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Packeton seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
C
Comapi
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | portal-cpaas.dotdigital.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

No analysis of Packeton yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using Packeton and Comapi. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

I made a tool for mirroring Composer dependencies. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a free Private Packagist alternative that support Composer repositories which require authentication. The source code available on GitHub... Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking Comapi since Mar 2021.
When comparing Packeton and Comapi, you can also consider the following products.


Composer package archive as a service for PHP
Compare Private Packagist to Packeton or Comapi:

The world’s most advanced repository manager.
Compare Artifactory to Packeton or Comapi:

Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.
Compare Cloudsmith to Packeton or Comapi:

The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Compare Sonatype Nexus Repository to Packeton or Comapi:

Toran acts as a proxy for Packagist, GitHub and other repositories.
Compare Toran Proxy to Packeton or Comapi: