
Cloudsmith
Artifactory
CloudRepo
Gemfury
Sonatype Nexus Repository
jFrog
fpm
Free hosted Node.js, Debian, RPM, Java, Python and RubyGem repositories. Chef, Puppet, Jenkins, Buildkite, CircleCI and Travis CI integrations.

Day One
Journalistic
REFLECTLY
Journal App
SELF Journal
Gekri
Journey
Organize all your ideas

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, packagecloud seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | packagecloud.io | usejournal.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2016 | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2018 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Packagecloud is a cloud-based package repository that allows its users to host npm, python, rubygem, apt, Java/Maven, and yum repositories without having to configure anything first. Being a cloud-based solution, it also allows one to distribute various software packages in a uniform, scalable,...
No description of Journal yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of packagecloud yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Journal is recommended for writers and bloggers who prefer a minimalist and user-friendly platform to share their content. It is well-suited for individuals who value community interaction and are looking for a medium to connect with other writers and readers. New bloggers who want an easy-to-navigate platform without the complexity of more feature-rich services may find Journal particularly appealing.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No packagecloud videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
The ULTIMATE Bullet Journal Notebook Comparison
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using packagecloud and Journal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Packagecloud is a cloud-based package repository that allows its users to host npm, python, rubygem, apt, Java/Maven, and yum repositories without having to configure anything first. Being a cloud-based solution, it...
We have no reviews of Journal yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Looks like the repository on packagecloud.io don't have the latest version yet, it only lists 0.0.23? I got 0.0.24 from somewhere though. Source: almost 4 years ago
Forcing the config can be don manually by modifying the config files that points to different repos in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, or for packages on packagecloud.io, you can use the method that I describe. The latter works because... Source: about 4 years ago
The error you are seeing is because you probably ran one of the steps that creates a configuration in your system that points to packagecloud.io, so that your system can retrieve packages from https://packagecloud.io/cs50/repo. However... Source: about 4 years ago
Tracking Journal since Mar 2021.
When comparing packagecloud and Journal, you can also consider the following products.

Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.
Compare Cloudsmith to packagecloud or Journal:

A simple journal application for the Mac, iPhone, and iPad. AboutTo learn more about Day One, see these two excellent reviews . PublishPublish is not available in Day One 2.
Compare Day One to packagecloud or Journal:

The world’s most advanced repository manager.
Compare Artifactory to packagecloud or Journal:

A simple, yet powerful micro journaling app
Compare Journalistic to packagecloud or Journal:

Public and Private Maven and Python (PyPi) repository package manager.
Compare CloudRepo to packagecloud or Journal:
