
Yay
paru
pikaur
Pamac
Pakku
aurutils
pacman (package manager)
An AUR helper that minimizes user interaction.

DeveloperToolStack
Free, no-signup developer tools for technical SEO: robots.txt, sitemap.xml and .htaccess generators, plus practical guides. Everything runs in your browser.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | fullstacktoolkit.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
use the AUR? time to get a new helper (pacaur, yaourt, yay)
No FullStackToolkit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using pacaur and FullStackToolkit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing pacaur and FullStackToolkit, you can also consider the following products.

Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.
Compare Yay to pacaur or FullStackToolkit:

120 free browser-based developer utilities. No sign-up required.
Compare DeveloperToolStack to pacaur or FullStackToolkit:
An AUR helper written in Rust and based on the design of yay. It aims to be your standard pacman wrapping AUR helper with minimal interaction.
Compare paru to pacaur or FullStackToolkit:

AUR helper with minimal dependencies. Review PKGBUILDs all in once, next build them all without user interaction.Inspired by pacaur, yaourt and yay.
Compare pikaur to pacaur or FullStackToolkit:

Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).
Compare Pamac to pacaur or FullStackToolkit:

Pakku is a pacman wrapper with additional features, such as AUR support. Stable release is available in AUR.
Compare Pakku to pacaur or FullStackToolkit: