Opus Clip Reviews

1. Word.Studio

   · Editor at Word.Studio · over 1 year ago
   Great for distilling long-form interviews into short form stories

   We've been using Opus Clip to create bite-size soundbite clips from longer form, educational content, and it is a huge time saver. The automatic editing is helpful and with a recent update, you can really customize the edit and add back in relevant soundbites that it may have cut out.

   You're not going to get 100% perfect clips right out of the gate, but you'll have so many options to choose from that. It is OK to throw a few away. in fact, we only use about 20% of the videos that it clips/edits automatically.

   If you don't want it to edit, you can use it to only generate captions. This is helpful if you don't have other software to do this.

   🏁 Competitors: Descript

   👍 Pros:    Unique features|Popular|Regular updates

   👎 Cons:    Edit text feature has a learning curve|There is a limited time to go in and edit clips before the video gets archived.

opencode Reviews

Opus Clip mentions (2)

• How a solo dev quickly built and sold his SaaS app for $20k 🏃‍♂️💰

  A year before officially launching NuloApp, Kaloyan was diving into the world of "faceless YouTube channels", those social media accounts that post short, simple, sometimes AI-narrated videos. Kaloyan wanted to start his own channel, but noticed that the common tools to generate short-form content from long-form videos, such as Opus.pro, were very expensive. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Built in Days, Acquired for $20K: The NuloApp Story

  A year before officially launching NuloApp, Kaloyan realized that many creators in the "faceless YouTube channels" niche were using tools like Opus.pro to generate short-form content from long-form videos, but these tools were very expensive. Without yet earning revenue from YouTube or TikTok, Kaloyan decided to take matters into his own hands, building his own tool in just a month. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

opencode mentions (67)

• ZCode: Claude Code from the Makers of GLM

  Https://opencode.ai/ OpenCode was the first agent harness I used, and I have always like it. You can configure a wide variety of providers, but it's open source and has a number of core contributors. The other opinionated option is Pi (the Pi agent harness). This is a great lightweight option and also supports a number of providers. You can also use local model servers. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago

• AI for Less Popular Programming Languages

  OpenCode with GLM 5.2 wrote custom Emacs Lisp to pinpoint within the file where the missing or extra bracket could be. It rewrote the custom code to check various parts of the file. Each of those is a tool use and many, many tokens burned. The next step is to turn those custom scripts written by the AI agent into a tool to speed up the process, or a skill that shows how to use other tools to speed up the process. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

• How to Run Reliable Local LLM Agents on an RTX 3090: A Benchmark (5 Models, Priced in Watts)

  I gave GLM-4.5-Air (106B, open weights) 12 coding tasks through opencode on my RTX 3090. It scored 0% — never edited a single file. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago

• The head chef model of AI collaboration

  Set up your stations. I work in two Ghostty terminals. The left side is for planning and viewing, the right for synchronous agents running through OpenCode. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago

• Testing GLM-5.2 on OpenCode: I'm impressed!

  If you want to try it yourself: grab OpenCode, point it at OpenRouter, select GLM 5.2, and give it a real task instead of a benchmark. The z.ai docs have the rest of the details. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago