Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenTofu VS Hashicorp Terraform

Compare OpenTofu VS Hashicorp Terraform and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OpenTofu logo OpenTofu

The open source infrastructure as code tool.

Hashicorp Terraform logo Hashicorp Terraform

Hashicorp Terraform is a tool that collaborate on infrastructure changes to reduce errors and simplify recovery.
  • OpenTofu Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • Hashicorp Terraform Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

OpenTofu features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenTofu is open-source, allowing developers to freely access and modify the code to better suit their infrastructure needs or contribute to its development.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OpenTofu typically benefits from a strong community of developers that can offer support, share use-cases, and contribute plug-ins or modules.
  • Cost-Effective
    As an open-source project, OpenTofu can be a cost-effective solution for infrastructure management, helping to reduce licensing fees associated with proprietary software.
  • Flexibility
    The ability to customize and extend the tool allows organizations to create tailored solutions that fit their specific infrastructure requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OpenTofu

  • Limited Official Support
    Unlike proprietary software, OpenTofu might not have dedicated support, requiring users to rely on community help or to self-solve issues.
  • Potential for Fragmentation
    With various contributors and forks, there might be inconsistencies in development, potentially leading to fragmentation or compatibility issues.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    For users not familiar with open-source infrastructure tools, the lack of formal documentation or resources might result in a steeper learning curve.
  • Resource-Intensive
    Setting up, maintaining, and customizing an open-source tool like OpenTofu may require significant internal resources and expertise.

Hashicorp Terraform features and specs

  • Infrastructure as Code
    Terraform allows users to define infrastructure in a high-level configuration language, making infrastructure management more consistent and less error-prone.
  • Multi-Cloud Support
    Terraform supports multiple cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and others, enabling users to manage a hybrid cloud environment efficiently.
  • State Management
    Terraform maintains a state file that helps in tracking the state of the infrastructure, making it easier to detect changes and apply updates.
  • Modular and Reusable Configuration
    Terraform configurations can be broken down into reusable modules, promoting a DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) approach and making complex infrastructure easier to manage.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Terraform has a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, sample code, and third-party modules through the Terraform Registry.
  • Plan Before Apply
    Terraform provides a 'terraform plan' command that allows users to preview changes before applying them, reducing the risk of unexpected modifications.
  • Declarative Language
    Terraform uses a declarative language (HCL - HashiCorp Configuration Language) that enables users to specify the desired end state of the infrastructure without having to define the exact steps to achieve it.

Possible disadvantages of Hashicorp Terraform

  • State File Management
    Managing state files can be challenging, especially in team environments. Locking mechanisms and remote backends need to be properly configured to avoid conflicts.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may find Terraform's learning curve steep, particularly if they are not familiar with infrastructure as code concepts and the specific syntax of HCL.
  • Limited Support for Certain Providers
    While Terraform supports a wide range of providers, the depth and quality of support may vary. Some less common providers may have incomplete or less reliable implementations.
  • Debugging Complexity
    Debugging Terraform configurations and state-related issues can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a good understanding of how Terraform works under the hood.
  • Versioning and Compatibility Issues
    Upgrading Terraform or its providers can sometimes lead to breaking changes. Keeping track of compatible versions and managing upgrades requires careful attention.
  • Performance
    Terraform can sometimes be slower than other infrastructure management tools, particularly when dealing with very large infrastructures or numerous resources.
  • Lack of Granular Control
    While Terraform's declarative approach simplifies many tasks, it may not provide the granular control needed for very complex or highly customized infrastructure scenarios.

Analysis of Hashicorp Terraform

Overall verdict

  • Yes, HashiCorp Terraform is considered a highly effective tool for managing infrastructure as code, especially in multi-cloud environments. It is praised for its flexibility, scalability, and active open-source community which consistently contributes to its development and support ecosystem.

Why this product is good

  • HashiCorp Terraform is widely regarded as a robust Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tool, helping organizations automate and manage their infrastructure efficiently. It offers several advantages, such as a declarative configuration language, a vast ecosystem of providers, state management, and the ability to manage resources across multiple cloud providers and on-premises environments. It supports a variety of use cases from provisioning and managing compute instances to automating complex multi-cloud environments.

Recommended for

  • Organizations adopting or operating in multi-cloud environments.
  • Development and operations teams looking for a programmable and scalable infrastructure management solution.
  • Teams aiming to improve their DevOps practices with automated provisioning and management.
  • Consultants and specialists involved in cloud architecture or IT infrastructure projects.

OpenTofu videos

Migrating from Terraform to OpenTofu

Hashicorp Terraform videos

Best Practices of Infrastructure as Code with HashiCorp Terraform

More videos:

  • Review - HashiCorp Terraform Adoption Stages

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenTofu and Hashicorp Terraform)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
62 62%
38% 38
No Code
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenTofu and Hashicorp Terraform. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenTofu and Hashicorp Terraform

OpenTofu Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenTofu yet.
Be the first one to post

Hashicorp Terraform Reviews

5 Best DevSecOps Tools in 2023
There are multiple providers for Infrastructure as Code such as AWS CloudFormation, RedHat Ansible, HashiCorp Terraform, Puppet, Chef, and others. It is advised to research each to determine what is best for any given situation since each has pros and cons. Some of these also are not completely free while others are. There are also some that are specific to a particular...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenTofu seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 34 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenTofu mentions (34)

  • The Complete Guide to OpenTofu: Why It’s Time to Ditch Terraform
    Enter OpenTofu – the community’s bold response and perhaps the future of Infrastructure as Code. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Terraform in DevOps – IaC, Workflow & Benefits
    Note: New versions of Terraform are placed under the BUSL license, but everything created before version 1.5.x stays open-source. OpenTofu is an open-source version of Terraform that expands on Terraform's existing concepts and offerings. It is a viable alternative to HashiCorp's Terraform, being forked from Terraform version 1.5.6. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Using Checkout Action in GitHub Actions Workflow
    A real-world example of this is the OpenTofu project, which uses the checkout action as part of its pipeline to clone the OpenTofu repository before building the OSS release:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Kubernetes and Container Portability: Navigating Multi-Cloud Flexibility
    OpenTofu – An open-source fork of Terraform, allows deploying entire cloud environments using Infrastructure as Code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Modern Infrastructure as Code: OpenTofu vs. Crossplane vs. Pulumi
    OpenTofu emerged as a community-driven fork of HashiCorp Terraform following licensing changes. Now under the Linux Foundation with plans to join the CNCF, OpenTofu preserves the familiar HCL syntax while ensuring an open governance model. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

Hashicorp Terraform mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hashicorp Terraform yet. Tracking of Hashicorp Terraform recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenTofu and Hashicorp Terraform, you can also consider the following products

zop.dev - Easily provision, manage, and monitor resources across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with Kops.dev.

Setapp - Your shortcut to prime apps on Mac, an App Store alternative

Spacelift.io - Collaborative Infrastructure For Modern Software Teams

Konfigure - APARTMENTS | VILLA | WORKSPACE | RETAIL

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Metavine Platform - Metavine Platform is a comprehensive Platform-as-a-Service that help businesses build agility and compete effectively in the digital world by enabling them to iterate and create apps quickly.