Software Alternatives & Startups

OpenCMS VS Jekyll

Compare OpenCMS VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

OpenCMS

OpenCms is an open source Java-based content management system for dealing with large-scale enterprise level of websites.

Rating
0 reviews
Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 204 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 204
CMS popularity
3% vs 97%
alternatives listed
22 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

OpenCMS
Jekyll
Website opencms.org jekyllrb.com
Pricing —
Open source
Company — Startup from the United States
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

OpenCMS 5 features
Jekyll 5 features
  • Open Source
    OpenCMS is open-source software, which means it is free to download and use. This reduces initial costs and allows for custom modifications by developers.
  • Flexibility
    OpenCMS offers a high degree of flexibility with its XML-based content management, allowing complex implementations tailored to specific needs.
  • Java-Based
    Being Java-based, OpenCMS benefits from the robustness, portability, and security features of Java, making it suitable for enterprises.
  • Integrated Workflow and Versioning
    It offers integrated workflow and version control, allowing teams to manage content revisions and approvals efficiently.
  • Extensive Module Support
    OpenCMS provides a wide range of modules and extensions that expand its functionality, catering to diverse requirements without starting from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    Due to its flexibility and the wealth of features, the initial setup and configuration can be complex and require a steep learning curve.
  • Java Requirement
    As it is Java-based, both developers and hosting environments need to support Java, which might complicate deployment for non-Java shops.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more popular CMS platforms like WordPress or Drupal, OpenCMS has a smaller community, which can limit readily available support and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running OpenCMS can incur a higher performance overhead, particularly if not optimized, due to its Java-based nature and extensive feature set.
  • User Interface
    The user interface of OpenCMS may seem outdated or less intuitive compared to modern CMS alternatives, affecting usability for non-technical users.
  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

OpenCMS
Jekyll

No analysis of OpenCMS yet.

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

OpenCMS 0 videos + Add
Jekyll 1 video + Add

No OpenCMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
OpenCMS
Jekyll
3% 3%
CMS
97% 97%
3% 3%
97% 97%
7% 7%
93% 93%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenCMS and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

OpenCMS no reviews yet
Jekyll no reviews yet

We have no reviews of OpenCMS yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

OpenCMS 0 mentions
Jekyll 204 mentions

Tracking OpenCMS since Mar 2021.

  • Managing private data from the web securely on AWS
    My bookmarks have been public since 1998, and the previous version, bookmarks-v3.0, was a static site generated by Jekyll and published on GitHub Pages: it cost nothing, and for a list of public links it was good enough. The criterion... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Setting up a hugo static site hosted with Porkbun
    This is a static site generated with hugo with the PaperMod theme. I wanted an easy to use static site generator. I considered Jekyll And believe it to be a good choice for static sites. There seemed to be slightly more themes I liked... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • So, you want to vibecode a linkblog?
    First of all, I modified my publishing programs to keep a (local) copy of each link published modulePublicationCache and then I thought about using it for my linkblog. I like very much jekyll for a blog and I requested to some AIs... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

View more

Alternatives to OpenCMS and Jekyll

When comparing OpenCMS and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products.