A basic marketing site built-on Jekyll and hosted via Cloudflare Pages. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I would suggest looking into static site generators. Some popular examples, which are used myself are: - Hugo: https://gohugo.io/ - Jekyll: https://jekyllrb.com. Source: 5 months ago
I created my blog using Jekyll, a great open-source tool that can transform your markdown content into a simple, old-fashioned-but-trendy, static site. What are the advantages of this approach? The site is super-light, super-fast, super-secure and SEO-friendly. Of course, it’s not always the best solution, but for some use cases, like a simple personal blog, it’s really a good option. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Yes, it's Markdown and I use https://jekyllrb.com with the theme "jekyll-theme-hacker" to generate the site. I quite like how simple it is. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Jekyll is a static site generator. It takes text written in your favorite markup language and uses layouts to create a static website. You can tweak the site’s look and feel, URLs, the data displayed on the page, and more. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
I'm using bridgetown because I like sitting on the bleeding edge, its basically a newer Jekyll which I would recommend checking out too. Bridgetown has a great modern dev experience but its missing some of the ecosystem from Jekyll. Not a problem for me because I'm really comfortable with Ruby. Source: 10 months ago
If you want to have a different UI or your blog to look in a very specific way I recommend using Jekyll or Bridgetown. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
I use Jekyll to build HTML from Asciidoc. To generate links, Jekyll uses two configuration parameters:. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
If I wanted to post a simple website today I would look into Jekyll. There are a ton of articles and answers to common questions etc. It itself is written in Ruby but using it will not likely help you to learn Ruby. One-step in the direction of learning Ruby and getting a simple website could be Bridgetown. This will start you down a path of learning Ruby and not Rails. We use Bridgetown for our company site at... Source: 12 months ago
You are writing entries in markdown, once uploaded, how does it become "usable content" ? A static site generator (eg: https://jekyllrb.com/) does additional steps prior to pushing up - templates, cross referencing, table of content, etc. There is a-lot of heavy lifting done in that engine. Source: 12 months ago
The other option is to have your own custom website either by hosting your own blogging platform such as WordPress, Ghost or by setting up a static website with Hugo, Gatsby or Jekyll. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Https://jekyllrb.com/ comes to my mind. What would differentiate your product? Source: 12 months ago
Ive used https://jekyllrb.com/ before and it was just what I needed, but if I were you Id look at the themes they offer and choose based on that, chances are that you'll work on it once, get it how you want it and never touch it again 🙂. Source: about 1 year ago
For actually building it you could use Jekyll or Hugo. Source: about 1 year ago
Jekyll is a static side generator from markdown and is really extendable. You can for sure configure it like this. Source: about 1 year ago
The blog parts of our site is similar to Jekyll, implying blogs are simply Markdown files, except the resolver transforming the Markdown into HTML is (pun!) Hyperlambda and not Jekyll. If you don't like Hyperlambda, Jekyll is an amazing alternative. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Do you know an article comparing Jekyll to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Jekyll. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.