
OpenAI Codex CLI
Claude Code
warp by spolu
aider
Zed
Ghostty
VS Code
Gemini CLI
Emisar.dev
Emisar is the last MCP server youโll need to install: a Zero-Trust gateway connecting Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and any AI agent to your infrastructure. One server handles production access, debugging, alerts, and internal operations, with new capabilities added as packs. Agents can inspect real production state, debug what they shipped, and help resolve incidents. Safe reads run automatically; policy allows, blocks, or routes risky actions for approval. No SSH keys, VPNs, remote shells, or standing shell access โ and every call is recorded.
OpenAI Codex CLI
Emisar.devNo features have been listed yet.
No Emisar.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Emisar.dev's answer:
emisar is for SRE, DevOps, platform engineering, infrastructure, and security teams that want AI agents to inspect and operate production systems. It is especially relevant to teams managing multiple Linux hosts, clusters, databases, cloud services, or regulated environments where unrestricted shell access and incomplete audit records are unacceptable.
Emisar.dev's answer:
The hosted control plane and operator interface use Elixir, Phoenix, LiveView, PostgreSQL, and Tailwind CSS. The host runner and MCP bridge are written in Go. Action packs use YAML and JSON Schema, while production infrastructure is managed with Terraform on Google Cloud. The system communicates through MCP, OAuth 2.1, TLS, and WebSockets.
Emisar.dev's answer:
Emisar.dev's answer:
Founder Andrii Dryga spent a decade working as a CTO, full-stack engineer, SRE, and DevOps engineer. He experienced the cost of running the wrong command on the wrong cluster, while also seeing AI solve operational problems in seconds. emisar grew from the need to preserve both truths: AI agents are useful, and production access must remain bounded. Its answer is to give agents a reviewed catalog of operations instead of a blank terminal.
Emisar.dev's answer:
emisar lets AI agents work on real infrastructure without giving them a shell. Agents choose from a finite catalog of typed, versioned actions. Policy decides what runs, what requires approval, and what is denied, while an outbound-only runner verifies the action again on the host. New capabilities arrive as packs behind the same MCP integration, and every request is recorded in both a searchable audit trail and a tamper-evident host journal. [
Emisar.dev's answer:
Choose emisar when you want an agent to keep investigating and handling routine operations without handing it SSH credentials or supervising every call. Compared with raw shell access, copy-paste workflows, or one-off MCP servers, emisar provides reviewed action contracts, host-level enforcement, risk-based policy, scoped access, approvals, pack integrity checks, and a durable audit trail. It is built specifically for governed infrastructure access rather than generic automation.
Based on our record, OpenAI Codex CLI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
One of the first things I asked Pi was whether it could show my OpenAI usage limits in its status line. It replied that it should be possible with the Codex CLI. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
>kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow. Isnยดt codex MIT https://github.com/openai/codex ? - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
> a huge value is the [โฆ] Codex harness Codex. There are open source implementations Like Codex https://github.com/openai/codex. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
Test-drive it with Pro (5x or 20x) for a month. Download the Codex CLI client from https://github.com/openai/codex and auth it in the browser via the URL it provides. Set the model to 5.6-Sol and effort to max. - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago
OpenAI doesn't require that; only Anthropic does. OpenAI's harness is fully open source[1], and (AFAIK) doesn't come with any kind of signed-build request integrity verification like Claude does. And by that logic, if you're allowed to use their API with a fork of Codex that you yourself compiled, there's nothing stopping you from making some other harness act like such a fork. [1] https://github.com/openai/codex. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโno more context switching, just breakthrough results.
warp by spolu - Secure and simple terminal sharing
aider - aider is AI pair programming in your terminal
Zed - Zed is a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.
Ghostty - A fast, feature-rich, and cross-platform terminal emulator
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft