
Forecast Library
GitHub
figshare
Medium
Substack
arXiv
Open Access Button
Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.

ButterDocs
iA Writer
Orchard
JotBot AI
First Book ai
Grammarly
Cowriter
The AI-first document editor.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Open Science Framework seems to be a lot more popular than Type. While we know about 38 links to Open Science Framework, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Type.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | osf.io | type.ai |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
What is the Open Science Framework all about?
More videos
MORE FUN Than A Super Car! // 2023 Civic Type R Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Open Science Framework and Type. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
https://type.ai It has embedded GPT4 in a way that more natural for long form content. Have tried about another 7 ai text generators/editors and so far is the best. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
My worst experience was when I copied a bit of historical novel into type.ai creative writing tool and after describing a powerful king the hints to continue the story were all like " The king's behavior has led to a breakdown of social... Source: over 3 years ago
Hi HN, we're Stew and Stefan from Type (https://type.ai/ And here’s a demo that includes math and code blocks: https://type.ai/code-math-demos, we’d love to hear what you think. We think Type feels pretty different from other AI writing... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
When comparing Open Science Framework and Type, you can also consider the following products.

Portable, verifiable receipts for public forecasts
Compare Forecast Library to Open Science Framework or Type:


Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to Open Science Framework or Type:


Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.
Compare figshare to Open Science Framework or Type:

Orchard is a free, open source, community-focused content management system written in ASP.
Compare Orchard to Open Science Framework or Type: