Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Open Authenticator VS Obsidian

Compare Open Authenticator VS Obsidian and see what are their differences

1Password
1Password can create strong, unique passwords for you, remember them, and restore them, all directly in your web browser. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Open Authenticator logo Open Authenticator

A trusted open-source Authenticator. Formerly known as SmartWatch2 Authenticator free.

Obsidian logo Obsidian

GraphQL caching tool for the Deno runtime environment
  • Open Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-20
  • Obsidian Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-26

Open Authenticator features and specs

  • Security Enhancement
    Open Authenticator provides an additional layer of security for applications by requiring a separate authentication process beyond simple username and password login systems.
  • Open-Source
    As an open-source project, Open Authenticator allows developers to review, modify, and improve the code, fostering transparency and community-driven development.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It supports various platforms and devices, making it versatile and adaptable to diverse technological ecosystems and user environments.

Possible disadvantages of Open Authenticator

  • Limited Support
    Since it is an archived project on Google Code, it may not receive official support or updates, leaving potential security vulnerabilities unpatched.
  • Complex Setup
    Implementing Open Authenticator can be complex, requiring technical expertise and understanding of authentication protocols, which might be a barrier for some developers.
  • Deprecation Risk
    With the project archived, there is a risk it may become obsolete or incompatible with newer technologies and standards over time.

Obsidian features and specs

  • Customizability
    Obsidian offers a high level of customizability, allowing users to personalize their workspace with plugins, themes, and settings to suit their workflow preferences.
  • Markdown Support
    It uses Markdown for writing and formatting, enabling users to create and manage plaintext notes that are easy to export and compatible with other Markdown-supporting applications.
  • Local Storage
    Obsidian stores notes locally on your device, providing greater privacy and control over data without relying on cloud services for storage.
  • Linking and Backlinking
    The software excels in creating connections between notes through bidirectional linking, helping users to build a network of related ideas and facilitating complex knowledge management.
  • Community and Extensions
    A vibrant community offers numerous third-party plugins and extensions, enhancing the basic functionality of Obsidian and helping users to expand its capabilities to meet diverse needs.

Possible disadvantages of Obsidian

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, new users might face a steep learning curve when beginning to use Obsidian effectively.
  • Lack of Native Mobile App
    While Obsidian has mobile apps, some users feel they lack the full functionality and smooth experience of the desktop version, which can hinder productivity on the go.
  • No Built-in Cloud Sync
    Obsidian does not offer an integrated cloud syncing solution, requiring users to set up third-party cloud services like Dropbox or Google Drive for cross-device access.
  • Resource Intensive with Large Vaults
    Handling very large vaults with numerous notes and extensive linking can become resource-intensive, potentially slowing down performance on less powerful devices.
  • Limited Task Management Features
    Obsidian is primarily a note-taking tool, and its built-in task management features are limited compared to dedicated task management applications.

Analysis of Open Authenticator

Overall verdict

  • Given its open-source status and focus on security and simplicity, Open Authenticator was generally considered a good tool for managing authentication keys. However, it's important to note that Google Code was shut down in 2016, and the project's current status may be unknown. Users should ensure they are referring to a maintained and updated version or consider alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Open Authenticator was a project hosted on Google Code aimed at providing a simple and secure way to manage authentication keys. Its open-source nature meant that anyone could inspect and modify the code, contributing to security through transparency. It was designed to be user-friendly and aimed at helping users manage multiple authentication keys efficiently.

Recommended for

    Open Authenticator was ideal for developers and tech enthusiasts who needed a free, transparent, and customizable solution for managing authentication. It was also suitable for those who prioritize open-source software for security reasons. However, given its likely obsolete nature due to the shutdown of Google Code, it is recommended to look for more current solutions that receive regular updates.

Open Authenticator videos

No Open Authenticator videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Obsidian videos

+ Add

I Tried Obsidian Note Taking for a Week... (MD App Review, Tips, Features, Guide, and Setup)

More videos:

  • Review - OBSIDIAN: Getting Started, Facts & Pricing
  • Review - Obsidian: The Most Secure Notion Alternative (not sponsored)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Authenticator and Obsidian)

Open Authenticator

Obsidian

Identity And Access Management
100 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0
Note Taking
0 0%
Note Taking
100% 100
Password Management
100 100%
Password Management
0% 0
Notes
0 0%
Notes
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Authenticator and Obsidian. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Authenticator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Authenticator mentions (2)

  • Gitlab Explores Sale
    Google had a code hosting service (free for open source projects) with repo, issue tracker, and wiki. But it was shut down in 2016. Now there is just an archive: https://code.google.com/archive/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • What Are Your Moves Tomorrow - March 16, 2023
    Except Google will abandon it just like they abandoned https://code.google.com/archive/. Source: over 2 years ago

Obsidian mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Obsidian yet. Tracking of Obsidian recommendations started around Apr 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Authenticator and Obsidian, you can also consider the following products

Authenticator - Authenticator is a simple, free, and open source two-factor authentication app.

Joplin - Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.

Aegis Authenticator - Aegis Authenticator is a free, secure and open source app to manage your 2-step verification tokens...

Google Keep - Capture notes, share them with others, and access them from your computer, phone or tablet. Free with a Google account.

Authenticator Hub - How to enable 2 step verification for your accounts? Check our step-by-step guides to easily activate 2FA in all your accounts.

Standard Notes - A safe place for your notes, thoughts, and life's work

Loading...