On the Issues VS Emisar.dev
Compare On the Issues VS Emisar.dev and see what are their differences
incident management, error monitoring, alerting, on-call, devops, developer tools, webhooks, mobile
featured
On the Issues
ISideWith
Vote Smart
Facebook Town Hall
GovTrack.us
Votegraph
Congress.gov
Ballotpedia
Emisar.dev
Emisar is the last MCP server youโll need to install: a Zero-Trust gateway connecting Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and any AI agent to your infrastructure. One server handles production access, debugging, alerts, and internal operations, with new capabilities added as packs. Agents can inspect real production state, debug what they shipped, and help resolve incidents. Safe reads run automatically; policy allows, blocks, or routes risky actions for approval. No SSH keys, VPNs, remote shells, or standing shell access โ and every call is recorded.
On the Issues Emisar.devNo features have been listed yet.
Emisar.dev's answer:
emisar is for SRE, DevOps, platform engineering, infrastructure, and security teams that want AI agents to inspect and operate production systems. It is especially relevant to teams managing multiple Linux hosts, clusters, databases, cloud services, or regulated environments where unrestricted shell access and incomplete audit records are unacceptable.
Emisar.dev's answer:
The hosted control plane and operator interface use Elixir, Phoenix, LiveView, PostgreSQL, and Tailwind CSS. The host runner and MCP bridge are written in Go. Action packs use YAML and JSON Schema, while production infrastructure is managed with Terraform on Google Cloud. The system communicates through MCP, OAuth 2.1, TLS, and WebSockets.
Emisar.dev's answer:
Emisar.dev's answer:
Founder Andrii Dryga spent a decade working as a CTO, full-stack engineer, SRE, and DevOps engineer. He experienced the cost of running the wrong command on the wrong cluster, while also seeing AI solve operational problems in seconds. emisar grew from the need to preserve both truths: AI agents are useful, and production access must remain bounded. Its answer is to give agents a reviewed catalog of operations instead of a blank terminal.
Emisar.dev's answer:
emisar lets AI agents work on real infrastructure without giving them a shell. Agents choose from a finite catalog of typed, versioned actions. Policy decides what runs, what requires approval, and what is denied, while an outbound-only runner verifies the action again on the host. New capabilities arrive as packs behind the same MCP integration, and every request is recorded in both a searchable audit trail and a tamper-evident host journal. [
Emisar.dev's answer:
Choose emisar when you want an agent to keep investigating and handling routine operations without handing it SSH credentials or supervising every call. Compared with raw shell access, copy-paste workflows, or one-off MCP servers, emisar provides reviewed action contracts, host-level enforcement, risk-based policy, scoped access, approvals, pack integrity checks, and a durable audit trail. It is built specifically for governed infrastructure access rather than generic automation.
Based on our record, On the Issues seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Seems a bit different. I used to buy into the "both are wrong and on the same team" theory. That is just an incorrect and false narrative. We elect our representatives... There is a place we can look at their past voting records, etc. ontheissues.org ... IT IS ON US TO VOTE and make sure we do our best to elect folks who work for US and not for the wealthy. Source: about 3 years ago
I agree. We all need to look into voting records, etc. Look who the best person is to put in office to work for us. I use ontheissues.org as I am sure there are other sites and articles as well. The website I posted lets you know stances that have been taken by certain candidates in the past and currently. Source: about 3 years ago
Ontheissues.org and ballotpedia.org. Source: almost 4 years ago
Don't be fooled either. This isn't the government's decision to make. It's ours. The Federal Government has very limited powers. Most powers, and things that affect citizens, are controlled by the state governments. So if you care about something that needs to be changed like wealth inequality, Marijuana legalization, or public education, then get involved in your local politics. Open a new tab right now. Google... Source: over 4 years ago
Yeah, I think Paul is correct. I went thru all the republicans at ontheissues.org a month or two ago and counted about 12 republicans who indicated they were open to some form of mj reform; maybe a couple who might be open to legalization. Noteworthy to mention there are 3 dem senators opposed to legal; 60 pro votes simply aren't there. Source: over 4 years ago
ISideWith - See which American political parties, candidates, and ballot initiatives match your beliefs based on the 2019 issues that are most important to you.
Vote Smart - Vote Smart, formerly called Project Vote Smart, is a non-profit, non-partisan research organization...
Facebook Town Hall - Easily view the Facebook Pages of Local, State, and Federally elected officials according to your...
GovTrack.us - GovTrack.us enables users to track the bills and members of the United States Congress.
Votegraph - "Votegraph provides you with an easy-to-manage and inexpensive campaign profile for reaching...
Congress.gov - Search Results from U.S. Congress legislation, Congressional Record debates, Members of Congress, legislative process educational resources presented by the Library of Congress