Table of contents
Comprehensive Political Coverage
On the Issues provides a wide range of information on various political figures and their stances on numerous issues, allowing users to gain a holistic view of their positions.
Non-Partisan
The platform aims to present information without political bias, making it a valuable resource for individuals seeking balanced insights into political stances across party lines.
Issue-Based Categorization
The website categorizes politicians' views by issues, making it easy for users to find concise summaries of where politicians stand on specific topics.
Historical Context
On the Issues often provides historical voting records and statements from politicians, helping users understand the evolution of a politician's positions over time.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if On the Issues is good.
Check the traffic stats of On the Issues on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of On the Issues on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of On the Issues's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of On the Issues on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about On the Issues on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Seems a bit different. I used to buy into the "both are wrong and on the same team" theory. That is just an incorrect and false narrative. We elect our representatives... There is a place we can look at their past voting records, etc. ontheissues.org ... IT IS ON US TO VOTE and make sure we do our best to elect folks who work for US and not for the wealthy. Source: about 3 years ago
I agree. We all need to look into voting records, etc. Look who the best person is to put in office to work for us. I use ontheissues.org as I am sure there are other sites and articles as well. The website I posted lets you know stances that have been taken by certain candidates in the past and currently. Source: about 3 years ago
Ontheissues.org and ballotpedia.org. Source: almost 4 years ago
Don't be fooled either. This isn't the government's decision to make. It's ours. The Federal Government has very limited powers. Most powers, and things that affect citizens, are controlled by the state governments. So if you care about something that needs to be changed like wealth inequality, Marijuana legalization, or public education, then get involved in your local politics. Open a new tab right now. Google... Source: over 4 years ago
Yeah, I think Paul is correct. I went thru all the republicans at ontheissues.org a month or two ago and counted about 12 republicans who indicated they were open to some form of mj reform; maybe a couple who might be open to legalization. Noteworthy to mention there are 3 dem senators opposed to legal; 60 pro votes simply aren't there. Source: over 4 years ago
Socially Moderate-Conservative, Economically Liberal (ontheissues.org rates him as a "moderate liberal populist"). Source: over 4 years ago
As others have mentioned, this could easily end up being biased, so would need to be strictly fact-based. Unfortunately that would also probably be boring, but not necessarily. The easiest way would be to use an existing source like ontheissues.org. Source: over 4 years ago
That was one year... Look at everything else and don't just nitpick one thing. Out of the 22 things I listed from ontheissues.org, many of them are pro-LGBT+ rights. Source: about 5 years ago
He did not just say that to get votes. Obama supported legalizing same-sex marriage all the way back in 1996. Here is some stuff from ontheissues.org on Obama and LGBT+ issues:. Source: about 5 years ago
So, when looking up their political stances on ontheissues.org, Liz Cheney is definitely further to the right than Elise Stefanik. Of course, every liberal publication I read swears that it's because Liz dared to speak out against Trump, and that might be spot-on or it might be pure rubbish, but I'd like to hear your opinions on this from your perspective. Source: about 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing On the Issues to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is On the Issues good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss On the Issues here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
