Hey, thanks for the mention! I'm the creator of Nodewood, and I'm happy to answer any questions anyone has on it, or really anything else in the space I can help with. Source: over 3 years ago

This is largely why I built Nodewood [1]. Every time I wanted to start a new project, almost always a SaaS idea, I'd skip over the "boring stuff" like building user management, subscription management, teams, admin, all that, to get to the meat of the business logic, to make sure I had a valid idea. But I still needed all that stuff eventually, so I'd have to lose time later building it all in! So I decided to... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

This is actually part of why I created Nodewood [1], because every new Node project required pulling all that together, and every new SaaS idea I had had the same basic requirements (user management, subscription management, teams support, etc). Then I figured, if I found this useful, surely others would too, so I packaged it up and have had a few happy customers since then, who have helped me refine it, which... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Well, I've spoken about this before, and on here no less, but only really in response to posts like this. I don't do any advertising or speak about mine except in interviews, since it's usually indicative of the kind of requirements they're looking for. I created a SaaS bootstrap for Javascript called Nodewood [1]. It actually started as just a template for me, because there's a lot of setup for each new JS web... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Disclaimer: I'm the author of the following boilerplate. Nodewood (https://nodewood.com/) is a Javascript SaaS boilerplate built to take advantage of using Javascript on the server and in the UI. Models, Validators, and other business logic can be re-used in both builds, so you don't have to write, rewrite, and maintain that logic in both places, or in different languages. It has built-in subscription management... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

What the person above is suggesting: * https://pi.dev/ * https://omp.sh/ Personally I also think that OpenCode is nice, their CLI version is enjoyable and their desktop/web version is mostly okay: * https://opencode.ai/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago

I wired it into OpenCode, an open-source coding harness similar to Claude Code and Codex. I'm using an OpenCode Zen key and a Gemini key, and together, these give me access to multiple SOTA models for free, without touching a separate dashboard for each provider. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago

I drove it from my coding-agent with a handful of commands. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago

Https://pi.dev/docs/latest/providers#openai-codex is specific that it "Requires ChatGPT Plus or Pro subscription". https://opencode.ai are also both specific that it's for "Plus/Pro" subscriptions. Is there some link where you saw free tier Codex use in non-official apps is allowed by OpenAI? (I have used the free tier in the official Codex app, but as you said, labs can have different rules for official vs... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago

Https://opencode.ai/ OpenCode was the first agent harness I used, and I have always like it. You can configure a wide variety of providers, but it's open source and has a number of core contributors. The other opinionated option is Pi (the Pi agent harness). This is a great lightweight option and also supports a number of providers. You can also use local model servers. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago