Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ninja Build VS packagecloud

Compare Ninja Build VS packagecloud and see what are their differences

CGPulse
Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

packagecloud logo packagecloud

Free hosted Node.js, Debian, RPM, Java, Python and RubyGem repositories. Chef, Puppet, Jenkins, Buildkite, CircleCI and Travis CI integrations.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • packagecloud Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-07

Packagecloud is a cloud-based package repository that allows its users to host npm, python, rubygem, apt, Java/Maven, and yum repositories without having to configure anything first. Being a cloud-based solution, it also allows one to distribute various software packages in a uniform, scalable, and dependable manner without investing in infrastructure.

Regardless of the programming language or OS, you can keep all of the packages that you need to be deployed across your organizationโ€™s workstations in one repo. Then, without owning any of the infrastructure required, you may securely and efficiently distribute packages to your devices.

Ninja Build

Website
ninja-build.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

packagecloud

Website
packagecloud.io
Pricing URL
Official packagecloud Pricing
$ Details
freemium $89.0 / Monthly ("Starter Plan", "20 Gb Transfer", "5 Gb Storage")
Platforms
Cross Platform Linux Windows Mac OSX Cloud
Release Date
2016 January
Edit details

Ninja Build features and specs

  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninjaโ€™s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages of Ninja Build

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

packagecloud features and specs

  • Unlimited Users
  • Unlimited Repositories
  • Universal asset management
  • CI/CD Pipeline Orchestration

Analysis of Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

packagecloud videos

No packagecloud videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and packagecloud)

Ninja Build

packagecloud

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
Package Manager
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and packagecloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ninja Build and packagecloud

Ninja Build Reviews

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet.
Be the first one to post

packagecloud Reviews

What is Artifactory?
Packagecloud is a cloud-based package repository that allows its users to host npm, python, rubygem, apt, Java/Maven, and yum repositories without having to configure anything first. Being a cloud-based solution, it also allows one to distribute various software packages in a uniform, scalable, and dependable manner without investing in infrastructure. Regardless of the...
Source: blog.packagecloud.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build should be more popular than packagecloud. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (23)

  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Using Make โ€“ writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

packagecloud mentions (5)

  • Reports on successful blocks
    Looks like the repository on packagecloud.io don't have the latest version yet, it only lists 0.0.23? I got 0.0.24 from somewhere though. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I tried to switch to the testing branch of Debian and below is my /etc/apt/sources.list:
    Forcing the config can be don manually by modifying the config files that points to different repos in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, or for packages on packagecloud.io, you can use the method that I describe. The latter works because packagecloud.io has a robust strip to create config files based on the detected operating systems or you can force a certain operating system/dist as shown above. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I tried to switch to the testing branch of Debian and below is my /etc/apt/sources.list:
    The error you are seeing is because you probably ran one of the steps that creates a configuration in your system that points to packagecloud.io, so that your system can retrieve packages from https://packagecloud.io/cs50/repo. However since there are no Debian bookworm packages there, you are seeing the error. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Packagecloud.io โ€” Hosted Package Repositories for YUM, APT, RubyGem and PyPI. Limited free plans, open source plans available via request. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • Need help installing Pi hole
    You have something installed via packagecloud.io which is no longer avalaible. Delete the line from your sources. Source: about 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and packagecloud, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Cloudsmith - Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

Artifactory - The worldโ€™s most advanced repository manager.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

CloudRepo - Public and Private Maven and Python (PyPi) repository package manager.

Loading...