That's actually a great argument for Nim[0]. Easy interop with C, native-speed performance, and a syntax very close to Python in both readability and how quickly you can get something working. Batteries included, automatic memory management without a conventional GC and metaprogramming - is a really cool combination. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

Coincidentally, just a few days ago, I tried to run Nim[0] on Windows XP as an experiment. And to my surprise, the latest 32-bit release of Nim simply works out the box. But Nim compiles to C, so I also needed C compiler and all modern versions of mingw failed to launch. After some time I managed to find very old Mingw (gcc 4.7.1) that have finally worked [0]. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/ [1] -... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

You can replace Python with Nim. It checks literally all your marks (expressive, fast, compiled, strong-typing). It's as concise as Python, and IMO, Nim syntax is even more flexible. https://nim-lang.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Have you tried Nim? Strong and static typed, versatile, compiles down to native code vía C, interops with C trivially, has macros and stuff to twist your brain if you're into that, and is trivially easy to get into. https://nim-lang.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

If a script is simple - I use posix sh + awk, sed, etc. But if a script I write needs to use arrays, sets, hashtable or processes many files - I use Nim[0]. It's a compiled systems-programming language that feels like a scripting language: - Nim is easy to write and reads almost like a pseudocode. - Nim is very portable language, runs almost anywhere C can run (both compiler and programs). - `nim r script.nim` to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Plain CSS or a minimal framework like Pico or Simple.css will serve you better. Don't introduce complexity you don't need. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Website: Website GitHub Repo: GitHub Repo. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

> The decision to skip CSS by depending on https://simplecss.org/ is smart I was always a little disappointed with how most web browsers choose to render HTML pages that had no explicit styling information. I'm not necessarily saying web browsers should have defaults as opinionated as simple.css, but the default page margins, padding, text styles, headings, etc that they picked aren't particularly attractive.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

This is great. The decision to skip CSS by depending on https://simplecss.org/ is smart - CSS is a whole other thing, and having that on top of basic HTML would be pretty intimidating. I did worry a bit about https://htmlforpeople.com/zero-to-internet-your-first-website/ - "Step 1. Create a folder on your computer" - because apparently a large number of people these days don't understand files and folders at all!... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago