Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NanoReview VS PassMark CPU Benchmarks

Compare NanoReview VS PassMark CPU Benchmarks and see what are their differences

NanoReview logo NanoReview

Most advanced CPU and SoC comparison

PassMark CPU Benchmarks logo PassMark CPU Benchmarks

Over 600,000 CPUs and 1,000 models benchmarked and compared in graph form, updated daily!
  • NanoReview Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • PassMark CPU Benchmarks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

NanoReview features and specs

  • Comprehensive Comparisons
    NanoReview offers detailed side-by-side comparisons of tech products, aiding prospective buyers in making informed decisions based on features, performance, and value.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The website is designed with ease of navigation in mind, allowing users to quickly find the information they need without encountering clutter.
  • Regular Updates
    Nanoreview regularly updates its database, ensuring that users have access to the latest technology trends and reviews.

Possible disadvantages of NanoReview

  • Limited Analysis Depth
    While NanoReview provides a good overview, it sometimes lacks the in-depth analysis that tech enthusiasts may seek for specific product components.
  • Advertisement Presence
    The website contains advertisements, which can occasionally distract from the user experience and information retrieval.
  • Niche Audience
    The platform primarily targets tech-savvy users, which might not cater well to a broader audience looking for general and easily digestible tech advice.

PassMark CPU Benchmarks features and specs

  • Comprehensive Database
    PassMark provides a large and detailed database of CPU benchmarks, allowing users to compare the performance of a wide range of processors across different generations and manufacturers.
  • Cross-Platform Comparison
    The benchmarks offer data for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it easier to compare CPU performance across different platforms.
  • User-Contributed Scores
    Scores are based on results from a diverse user base, contributing to a wide range of performance data, which can provide a more realistic view of average CPU performance.
  • Updated Regularly
    PassMark frequently updates its benchmark scores, ensuring that users have access to the latest performance data and can incorporate new CPUs shortly after release.

Possible disadvantages of PassMark CPU Benchmarks

  • Synthetic Nature
    As with any benchmarking tool, results are based on synthetic tests that may not always reflect real-world performance accurately for all types of software and workloads.
  • Potential for Bias
    Since the benchmarks rely on user submissions, results may be skewed by outliers or incorrect configurations, although efforts are made to moderate and verify data.
  • Focus on Single Score
    PassMark's focus on providing a single overall score can oversimplify performance characteristics, which might lead users to overlook important aspects like power efficiency or specific workload capabilities.
  • Hardware Variability
    Differences in other hardware (e.g., RAM, storage) used in user-submitted tests can impact CPU scores, potentially leading to variations that are not solely attributable to the CPU itself.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NanoReview and PassMark CPU Benchmarks)
Startup Community
48 48%
52% 52
Shopping
52 52%
48% 48
Online Shopping
59 59%
41% 41
Software Marketplace
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NanoReview and PassMark CPU Benchmarks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PassMark CPU Benchmarks seems to be a lot more popular than NanoReview. While we know about 90 links to PassMark CPU Benchmarks, we've tracked only 3 mentions of NanoReview. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NanoReview mentions (3)

  • New Pantone Color
    The Moto G Stylus 2022 uses the Snapdragon 695 chipset. The razr_ is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. On a comparison I did on nanoreview.net, here is their summary:. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Top 10 Compelling Reasons to Choose an iPhone SE 3rd Generation in 2023
    It boasts one of the best performances among all smartphones currently on the market. The A15 Bionic chip still ranks in the top 7 smartphone chips globally, delivering exceptional performance and power efficiency (source: nanoreview.net). Source: over 1 year ago
  • I think I've narrowed two my phone options to two models..
    You should compare the specs on https://www.gsmarena.com and https://nanoreview.net/en. Source: over 3 years ago

PassMark CPU Benchmarks mentions (90)

  • Why does the M2 have such a low CPU benchmark?
    I would not use cpubenchmark.net. Their testing has been very questionable. Source: over 1 year ago
  • (PC building help) Is [Ryzen 9 9700 & Radeon RX 7900XTX] better than [i9-12900 & RTX 3080Ti] ? Why/why not?
    I decided to look through cpubenchmark.net to maybe gauge what CPUs and graphics cards are better than Cyberpunk's new requirements but still within my means. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Ryzen 5 1600 vs I5-7600K
    My friend is kindly giving me an old computer of his and I'm just trying to get grip of which parts I should combine from my current computer and the one he is giving me. The main component I am unsure of is the CPU, I currently have a Ryzen 5 1600 (3.2GHz) but the other computer has a Intel I5-7600K (3.6GHz). I've compared the two CPUs on cpubenchmark.net and it says the Ryzen 5 1600 is better despite having a... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Socket compatibility between Intel Core i5 7th gen vs 9th gen?
    I am currently upgrading my old (2017) pc. Since I do not have any hard requirement for it (I just use it for gaming once in a while...) I have decided to stay in budget buying used but decent component, and keeping my old motherboard. It was original provided with an Intel Core i5-7400 CPU, so it comes with the socket FCLGA1151. My idea is to upgrade to an Intel Core i5-9600K, as the 9th generation is the latest... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How did y’all learn about PCs? What sources would you guys recommend to learn it all?
    Cpubenchmark.net and videocardbenchmark.net for basic knowledge of hardware power. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NanoReview and PassMark CPU Benchmarks, you can also consider the following products

Versus - Find popular alternatives to anything in a jiffy

GSMArena - GSMArena is an online site that offers exhaustive and up and coming cell phone data.

Kimovil - Compare price, specs, reviews and benchmarks for smartphones and tablets.

HMC Tech - The ultimate tech compare tool.

CPU-World - Latest news and detailed information, identification and pictures of vintage and modern...

CNET - CNET is a website that provides you with the latest tech news and tech reviews. The homepage of the website is a huge feed of the latest tech stories that would take you hours to sort through. Read more about CNET.