Nabble
Google Groups
Mighty Networks
Discourse
Forumbee
Bigtent
Vanilla Forums
Admidio
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Nabble CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Nabble. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://nabble.com/ Lots of open source project use it as web ui for mailing list. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Hello. I have typically browsed the Qgis mailing lists using nabble.com but on the developer list there hasn't been a post n 9 days. Source: about 5 years ago
I was thinking about creating a forum just for the fun of it, and was wondering if nabble.com is a trustworthy site to make it with. It is free and I can find VERY few references to it across the internet... Is it safe, or does it come with viruses/data collection, etc? Has anyone used it themselves? Source: over 5 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Google Groups - Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Mighty Networks - Mighty Networks enables entrepreneurs, organizations, and companies to create and grow a community-powered brand.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Discourse - Discourse is an open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.