
Muck Rack
Meltwater
Cision
Agility PR Solutions
TVEyes
Newswire
Prowly
Critical Mention
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Muck Rack
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Cppcheck might be a bit more popular than Muck Rack. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to Muck Rack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Muck Rack | Senior Machine Learning Engineer | Remote | Full-time | https://muckrack.com Muck Rack is the leading SaaS platform for public relations and communications professionals. Our mission is to enable organizations to build trust, tell their stories, and demonstrate the unique value of earned media. Muck Rackโs AI-powered, comprehensive, and integrated platform streamlines the PR workflow to help businesses... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://muckrack.com/ * Harvard Library Innovation Lab. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
On many news websites, you can click on their name from any story they've written to see all of their writing with that publication. If they've been around for a bit, they'll probably have an entry on https://muckrack.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
Author integrity first, there are no authors to research when people are reading scripts. (https://muckrack.com/). Source: over 3 years ago
Muckrack.com is a good resource for seeing what journalists are writing about. It's quite eye-opening seeing how many of them are simply churning out the same 1000 words month in, month out. Source: over 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Meltwater - Intelligence you can act on
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Cision - Vocus: A Cision Company
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Agility PR Solutions - Agility PR Solutions provides media database, monitoring and analytics solutions to simplify the communications lifecycle.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.