Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

mosquitto VS FEEDBACKdeck

Compare mosquitto VS FEEDBACKdeck and see what are their differences

mosquitto

Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck

FEEDBACKdeck brings to WordPress, a gorgeous way to capture user feedback.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CodeeSuite
CodeeSuite gives hotels, restaurants and venues everything they need to create QR codes, digital menus and smart screens — and to track how they perform — from one dashboard. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, mosquitto seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 40 times since March 2021.

social mentions
40 vs 0
IoT Connectivity popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

mosquitto
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck
Website mosquitto.org feedbackdeck.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in
IoT Connectivity Data Integration IoT Web Service Automation +1
Customer Feedback User Feedback Feedback Surveys +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

mosquitto 7 features
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck 5 features
  • Lightweight
    Mosquitto has a small resource footprint making it ideal for devices with limited computational power and memory.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project under the Eclipse Foundation, Mosquitto benefits from community support and transparent development.
  • Standards Compliant
    Mosquitto implements the MQTT protocol as specified, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of MQTT clients and applications.
  • Cross-platform
    Offers compatibility with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and even some smaller OS for embedded systems.
  • Simple Configuration
    Ease of setup and straightforward configuration files make it accessible for users with less technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    Can scale from small projects to large-scale production environments with thousands of clients.
  • Security Features
    Supports SSL/TLS for secure communication and offers authentication and authorization mechanisms.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Persistence Options
    Mosquitto has limited out-of-the-box options for message persistence compared to more complex MQTT brokers.
  • Basic Monitoring Tools
    It provides basic monitoring and logging, which may not be sufficient for large-scale enterprise needs without additional tools.
  • Less Extensive Plugins
    Compared to some other brokers, Mosquitto offers fewer plugins and extensions for enhanced functionality.
  • Management Interface
    Lacks a built-in, user-friendly management interface for real-time management and monitoring of the broker.
  • Clustering Support
    Doesn't natively support clustering, which can be a limitation when high availability and load balancing are critical.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is decent documentation available, it may lack the comprehensive detail found in commercial solutions, making advanced configurations more challenging.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    FEEDBACKdeck offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and provide feedback efficiently.
  • Customizable Feedback Forms
    The platform allows users to create customized feedback forms tailored to specific needs, enhancing the relevance and utility of the collected data.
  • Real-time Analytics
    FEEDBACKdeck provides real-time analytics, enabling users to access instant insights and act promptly on feedback received.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It can integrate with various third-party applications, facilitating a seamless workflow for data management and analysis.
  • Responsive Customer Support
    The platform offers responsive and efficient customer support, ensuring that users receive timely assistance and resolutions to their queries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Features
    The free version of FEEDBACKdeck offers limited features, which may not be sufficient for users looking for comprehensive feedback solutions without a subscription.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features may require a learning curve, especially for users not familiar with feedback management tools.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Users have reported occasional performance issues, such as slow load times, which can hinder the feedback process.
  • Subscription Costs
    The subscription plans can be costly, potentially making it less accessible for small businesses or individual users with limited budgets.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

mosquitto
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck

No analysis of mosquitto yet.

Overall verdict

  • FEEDBACKdeck appears to be a lightweight, straightforward feedback collection tool aimed at helping teams gather and organize customer feedback and feature requests in one place. It's a solid choice for smaller teams or indie projects looking for a no-frills solution, though it may lack some advanced features found in larger, more established feedback management platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, easy-to-use interface for collecting and managing feedback
  • Helps centralize feature requests and customer suggestions in one board
  • Likely more affordable than enterprise-level feedback tools
  • Quick setup process suitable for small teams and startups
  • Focused feature set avoids unnecessary complexity for straightforward use cases

Recommended for

  • Indie developers and solo founders
  • Small startups needing a simple feedback board
  • Teams wanting an affordable alternative to larger feedback management suites
  • Product managers collecting lightweight customer input
  • Early-stage products validating feature ideas with users

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
mosquitto
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck
100% 100%
IoT Connectivity
0% 0%
0% 0%
User Feedback
100% 100%
100% 100%
Data Integration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Customer Feedback
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using mosquitto and FEEDBACKdeck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

mosquitto 40 mentions
FEE
FEEDBACKdeck 0 mentions
  • Home Assistant Works Great Until It Doesn't: 10 Years of Lessons
    Mosquitto: the MQTT broker Z2M talks through. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Self-updating Containers on Linux with Quadlet aka podman-system-generator
    Mosquitto is a simple message broker I've chosen to run as root. After placing the .container file in the right place and running systemctl daemon-reload (or rebooting), we can run systemctl start mosquitto. All the podman commands to... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Using nginx as a SSL offloading proxy to MQTT
    Nginx's stream_proxy and stream_ssl modules can be used to add tls/ssl support to mosquitto or any tcp server. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking FEEDBACKdeck since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to mosquitto and FEEDBACKdeck

When comparing mosquitto and FEEDBACKdeck, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...