MonoGame Reviews

BrowserStack Reviews

MonoGame mentions (8)

• LÖVE: 2D Game Framework for Lua

  You might like monogame. Same level of abstraction, but in C#. https://monogame.net. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Making Video Games in 2025 (without an engine)

  C# + https://monogame.net - Desktop: Windows, MacOS, Linux - Mobile: Android, iOS, iPadOS - Console: Playstation 4, Playstation 5, Xbox One, Nintendo Switch It used to be XNA but then Microsoft discontinued and the comunity created the API compatible MonoGame. Notable games: Terraria (when it was XNA), Stardew Valley, Celeste, Terraria and Fez. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Exploring MonoGame with F#: The Evolution of Kipo

  Kipo is the second prototype I've build with MonoGame and although Kps shares similarities, Kipo took off from where I became blocked with Kps. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Rust Dependencies Scare Me

  To be fair, there is no language that has a framework that contains all of these things... Unless you're using one of the game engines like Unity/Unreal. If you're willing to constrain yourself to 2D games, and exclude physics engines (assume you just use one of the Box2D bindings) and also UI (2D gamedevs tend to make their own UI systems anyway)... Then your best bet in the C# world is Monogame... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Free high-performance cross-platform game engine

  Defold has been there for a while, not sure of why this in on the front page right now. Anyways, Defold is good, the community, docs etc. Are on the lower side as compared to Godot. The other options include MonoGame https://monogame.net/ (Stardew Valley was written in it) and of-course the biggies like Unity or Unreal. A lot depends on how much investment in learning one wants to make, what is the feature set one... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

BrowserStack mentions (8)

• Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma

  This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness

  Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Unsupported country

  If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 3 years ago

• Windows vs Mac?

  For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 3 years ago

• Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?

  I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 3 years ago