Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MonoDevelop VS FreeBASIC

Compare MonoDevelop VS FreeBASIC and see what are their differences

MonoDevelop logo MonoDevelop

MonoDevelop enables developers to write desktop and web applications on Linux, Windows and Mac OS X.

FreeBASIC logo FreeBASIC

FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...
  • MonoDevelop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-19
  • FreeBASIC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-23

MonoDevelop features and specs

  • Cross-platform Support
    MonoDevelop runs on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to work in a consistent environment regardless of the operating system.
  • Integration with .NET Development
    MonoDevelop is tailored for .NET development, providing excellent support for C# and other .NET languages, which includes debugging, project management, and code completion features.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source IDE, MonoDevelop allows developers to contribute to its development and customize the environment to their specific needs.
  • Unity Development
    MonoDevelop is often used with Unity game development because of its strong support for C#, providing a seamless environment for game developers.
  • Built-in Version Control
    The IDE provides built-in support for version control systems, particularly Git, which facilitates easy tracking and management of code changes.

Possible disadvantages of MonoDevelop

  • Limited Language Support
    Compared to some other IDEs, MonoDevelop has limited support for languages outside of the .NET ecosystem, which can be a drawback for developers working with diverse languages.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that MonoDevelop can be slow or prone to crashing, particularly with larger projects, which can hinder productivity.
  • Less Modern UI
    The user interface of MonoDevelop is considered less modern or intuitive compared to some newer IDEs, which might affect the user experience.
  • Community Support
    While there is some community support due to its open-source nature, it is not as extensive or active as other mainstream IDEs, potentially making it harder to find solutions for issues.
  • Integration with Latest .NET Features
    MonoDevelop may not always support the latest .NET features or keep pace with the rapid development of the .NET ecosystem, which could be a limitation for developers looking to use the latest tools and frameworks.

FreeBASIC features and specs

  • Open Source
    FreeBASIC is open source, which means users can access the source code, contribute to the project, and customize it according to their needs.
  • BASIC Language Support
    FreeBASIC offers support for the BASIC programming language, attracting programmers who prefer or are familiar with this language, while also providing modern programming capabilities.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and DOS, which allows developers to write programs that can run on different operating systems without significant changes.
  • Compatibility
    FreeBASIC is compatible with Microsoft QuickBASIC and other older BASIC dialects, making it easier for developers to port legacy BASIC code.
  • Strong Community
    The FreeBASIC community is active, providing forums, documentation, and support that can be beneficial for both beginners and advanced users.

Possible disadvantages of FreeBASIC

  • Limited Library Support
    Compared to more popular languages like Python or C++, FreeBASIC has fewer libraries and third-party resources, which can limit functionality and ease of development.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    Although BASIC is traditionally seen as beginner-friendly, some aspects of FreeBASIC, especially its more advanced features, might present a learning curve.
  • Less Market Demand
    There is less market demand for FreeBASIC developers compared to more mainstream languages, which might limit job prospects for those who specialize in it.
  • Manual Memory Management
    FreeBASIC requires manual memory management, which can lead to potential errors like memory leaks if not handled properly, particularly for new programmers.
  • Outdated Perception
    BASIC languages, including FreeBASIC, sometimes suffer from an outdated perception that might lead to skepticism about its use for modern applications.

MonoDevelop videos

C# programming with MonoDevelop on Ubuntu 16.04

FreeBASIC videos

No FreeBASIC videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MonoDevelop and FreeBASIC)
IDE
51 51%
49% 49
Text Editors
54 54%
46% 46
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using MonoDevelop and FreeBASIC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MonoDevelop and FreeBASIC

MonoDevelop Reviews

We have no reviews of MonoDevelop yet.
Be the first one to post

FreeBASIC Reviews

  1. Can Not to Comapre FREEBASIC is a COMPILER NOT AN IDE

    HAS IDE AS FBEdit, FBNP,WINFBE, VisualFB, etc

    🏁 Competitors: Visual Basic
    👍 Pros:    Compiler|32|64|Windows linux mac|Mingw32 and mingw64|Free to use|Binding to c, c++

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FreeBASIC seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MonoDevelop mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MonoDevelop yet. Tracking of MonoDevelop recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FreeBASIC mentions (5)

  • Microsoft's Growing Control of Linux
    Outside of Microsoft created QB64: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QB64 - https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-wild-events-that-nearly-took Outside of Microsoft created Visual Basic IDE: - http://gambas.sourceforge.net/en/main.html - https://github.com/wekan/hx/tree/main/prototypes/ui/gambas Outside of Microsoft created FreeBasic: - https://freebasic.net. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • qb.js: An implementation of QBASIC in Javascript
    If you have linux or windows, you can try freebasic. I believe it has a qbasic compatibility mode. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are your opinions on modern BASIC dialects?
    Have you looked at https://freebasic.net/ and https://www.qb64.org/portal/ ? It's been ages since I actually wrote code in BASIC, but there do appear to be nice open-source options in the modern world. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • How to compile a BASIC code in linux ?
    I used https://freebasic.net/ ages ago. Works fine. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Blank Projects - Then And Now
    And here you can live though that pain again: https://freebasic.net/. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MonoDevelop and FreeBASIC, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft Visual Studio - Microsoft Visual Studio is an integrated development environment (IDE) from Microsoft.

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Eclipse - Eclipse is an open source community, whose projects are focused on building an open development platform comprised of extensible frameworks, tools and runtimes for building, deploying and managing software across the lifecycle.

Liberty BASIC - Easy Programming for Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, 8 and 10

Netbeans - NetBeans IDE 7.0. Develop desktop, mobile and web applications with Java, PHP, C/C++ and more. Runs on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and Solaris. NetBeans IDE is open-source and free.

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.