Monkey 2 VS thinBasic

• Cross-Platform Development
  Monkey 2 allows developers to write code once and deploy it across multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, streamlining the development process and saving time.
• Modern Language Features
  Monkey 2 supports modern programming language features such as type inference, generics, and lambda expressions, making it easier for developers to write clean and efficient code.
• Active Community
  The Monkey 2 community is active and engaged, providing support, resources, and shared knowledge, which can be very helpful for both new and experienced developers.
• Open Source
  Being open source, Monkey 2 allows developers to contribute to its improvement, ensuring that it can evolve according to the needs and desires of the community.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Documentation
  Monkey 2's documentation can be sparse or outdated in some areas, which might pose challenges for new developers trying to learn the language or troubleshoot issues.
• Smaller Ecosystem
  Compared to more popular programming languages, Monkey 2 has a smaller ecosystem, which might limit the availability of libraries, tools, and third-party support.
• Less Recognition
  Monkey 2 is not as widely recognized or adopted in the industry as some other programming languages, potentially impacting its perceived credibility and the availability of job opportunities.
• Development Pace
  While being open source is an advantage, the development pace of Monkey 2 might be slower than that of proprietary or more commercially supported languages, potentially delaying updates and new features.

• Simplicity
  thinBasic offers a straightforward syntax that is easy to learn for beginners, making it an accessible choice for those new to programming.
• Rapid Development
  Due to its simplicity and focus on procedural programming, thinBasic allows for quick prototyping and development of small to medium-sized programs.
• Rich Feature Set
  Despite its simplicity, thinBasic provides a wide range of features and modules, including support for graphics, sound, file manipulation, and more.
• Community Support
  thinBasic has an active user community and forums, where users can share scripts, discuss problems, and get support for their projects.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Object-Oriented Support
  thinBasic is primarily a procedural language and offers limited support for object-oriented programming, which may not meet the needs of developers accustomed to modern OOP languages.
• Platform Dependency
  thinBasic is primarily designed for Windows, which can be a restriction for developers seeking cross-platform compatibility.
• Performance Constraints
  As an interpreted language, thinBasic might not be suitable for applications that require high performance or computational efficiency.
• Niche Use Case
  The language is somewhat niche and not as widely adopted in the industry, which could result in a limited job market and fewer resources compared to more popular programming languages.

• Wonkey: A cross-platform FOSS programming language by the creator of BlitzBasic

  On one hand, BlitzBasic and BlitzMax was a key moment for me, 15 years ago, of 'getting' programming - I clearly remember as a teenager when some basic concepts clicked together, and here I am many years later a full-time indie game... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Tracking thinBasic since Mar 2021.