Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mockito VS CPPUnit

Compare Mockito VS CPPUnit and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Mockito logo Mockito

Mocking framework for unit tests in Java.

CPPUnit logo CPPUnit

CppUnit is the C++ port of the JUnit framework for unit testing.
  • Mockito Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • CPPUnit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Mockito features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Mockito provides a clean and simple API that makes it easy to create mock objects and set expectations on them, which reduces the learning curve for new users.
  • Flexible Stubbing
    Allows defining behavior for mock objects, including different outcomes for different inputs, which provides detailed control over the mocked behavior.
  • Enhanced Readability
    The use of clear, human-readable language in test cases helps improve the clarity and maintainability of tests.
  • Integration with JUnit
    Mockito integrates seamlessly with JUnit, a popular testing framework, leveraging annotations and runners for cleaner and more structured test code.
  • Active Community and Support
    Backed by a large and active user community, ensuring constant updates, improvements, and plentiful resources for troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Mockito

  • Limited Deep Mocking
    Mockito can struggle with deep mocking scenarios where you need to mock chained or deeply nested calls, which can add complexity to test setup.
  • Static Method Limitations
    Mockito does not natively support mocking of static methods, requiring additional tools or alternative approaches to handle such cases.
  • Potential Overuse
    Extensive use of mocking might indicate poor design choices, such as tight coupling, and can lead to fragile tests that require significant maintenance.
  • Requires Understanding of Best Practices
    Without understanding or adhering to best practices, developers might misuse Mockito, leading to over-mocking or inappropriate test setups.
  • Advanced Features Require Careful Use
    Advanced features such as answers, spies, or argument captors can increase test complexity and require a deeper understanding to avoid introducing flaky tests.

CPPUnit features and specs

  • Mature Framework
    CPPUnit is a well-established framework based on the xUnit architecture, which has been used for many years as the standard for C++ unit testing, offering robust and reliable testing capabilities.
  • Integration with Build Systems
    CPPUnit integrates well with popular build systems and IDEs, such as GNU Make and Visual Studio, facilitating streamlined build and test processes.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The framework has comprehensive documentation and community support, making it easier for developers to solve issues and understand its features.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    CPPUnit is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing for consistent testing across different operating environments.

Possible disadvantages of CPPUnit

  • Limited Modern Features
    Compared to more recent testing frameworks, CPPUnit lacks some modern features such as lambda expressions and template-based testing, which can limit its flexibility.
  • Verbose Test Code
    Writing tests in CPPUnit can be verbose and cumbersome, requiring more boilerplate code compared to newer frameworks.
  • Declining Popularity
    As newer frameworks like Google Test have emerged, CPPUnit's popularity has declined, potentially leading to reduced community activity and fewer updates.
  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration of CPPUnit can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for developers who are new to the framework.

Mockito videos

+ Add

Mockito JUnit Example

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Mockito Tutorial - Mocking With Junit and Maven
  • Review - Mockito Annotations - @Mock, @Runwith, @InjectMocks and @Captor

CPPUnit videos

+ Add

CS2103 - Setting up CppUnit with Visual Studio 2010

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mockito and CPPUnit)

Mockito

CPPUnit

Automated Testing
72 72%
Automated Testing
28% 28
HR
0 0%
HR
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Attendance Management Software
0 0%
Attendance Management Software
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mockito and CPPUnit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mockito seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mockito mentions (17)

  • Effective Strategies for Writing Unit Tests with External Dependencies like Databases and APIs
    For database interactions, tools like Mockito for Java or unittest.mock for Python allow you to create mock objects that return predefined responses or simulate specific behaviors like database query results or error conditions. This is especially useful for testing edge cases without needing to rely on a live database. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Top 10 Java Testing Tools Every Developer Should Know
    Mockito simplifies creating mock objects in unit tests, making it popular for behavior-driven development (BDD) in combination with frameworks like JUnit and TestNG. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Tutorial: Build a Java SDK based on OpenAPI Spec
    Testing is critical to maintaining the reliability of your SDK. For Java, tools Like JUnit and Mockito are Standard for unit testing and mocking. JUnit provides a simple, structured way to write tests, while Mockito allows you To mock objects in tests, which is particularly useful for API-driven SDKs where you need to simulate API responses. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • I build CRUDS as an intern. My boss told me my tests were ok, but too slow, so he modified them to run in a specific order to reuse the app context on all tests. Is that a good practice though?
    I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Instancio 2.2.0 released
    Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

CPPUnit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CPPUnit yet. Tracking of CPPUnit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mockito and CPPUnit, you can also consider the following products

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

SimpleTest - SimpleTest is an open source unit test framework for the PHP programming language.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

EasyMock - EasyMock provides dynamically generated Mock objects at runtime, without having to implement them.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Google Test - Google Test is a unit testing for C++ programming language that is based on xUnit architecture.

Loading...