I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: 12 months ago
Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 1 year ago
You could use mocks, but you'd basically be implementing JSch. I'm not mocking a framework, and recently learned my misgivings have a name: the soviet police station anti-pattern. Source: over 1 year ago
In Mockito it exists the possibilty to use ArgumentCaptor to allow developers to verify the arguments used during the call of mocked method, but not the result itself. Indeed, in the current release of Mockito it's not possible to capture it and my solution to do that is to build a ResultCaptor class which implements the Answer interface and generify it for more conveniance. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
So I am building my own little project, which you can read about HERE and I have made the decision to use as few libraries as possible. Now that I am doing some testing I need some mock objects, which means I have to try to recreate Mockito. So this series will be me recreating Mockito the best I can. This post will be about creating a simple single use case implementation that gets our annotation working. It... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
This step is a rather large one but it involves us first creating a new class in the unit testing folder. Then we identify what is being tested, private CalfRepository calfRepository;. Next we identify what the dependencies are, private CalfDao calfDao;. Then we use the @Before annotation to set up a method to run before every test. Then we use Mockito to set up a mocked object of the dependencies,... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Unit testing using Mockito, which typically means that all dependencies of a class are mocked. Source: over 2 years ago
You can also replace the real customerRepository with a mock version, and then ask the mock version what customers were sent to it:. Source: over 2 years ago
It's Mockito [1], which has been a standard for a while. There are other libraries and they use different strategies to provide this kind of functionalities (dynamic proxies, bytecode weaving, annotation processing, etc...). [1] https://site.mockito.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
No, that's not reason enough to change your source code. Use something like https://site.mockito.org/ to mock your objects for testing. Don't introduce unnecessary code just for the sake of testing - it'll make your code harder to maintain, and introduce more noise in an already verbose language. Source: almost 3 years ago
In case of Java why not just use mockito? Easy to use and super mature, always handy in tests https://site.mockito.org/ mock services according to desired scenarios. Source: almost 3 years ago
Mockito is an open-source and one of the preferred Java unit testing frameworks. This well-known Java-based mocking framework is primarily used for Java app unit testing. The major benefit of using Mockito is that there are no requirements to create mock objects, as the framework generates them automatically. It creates mocks by means of annotations. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
If you've ever used libraries like https://github.com/JakeWharton/hugo or https://hibernate.org/ (if you've ever done some backend development) and wondered how do they seem to add some code/logic into your app just by adding some annotation to some method, or if you ever wondered how mocking frameworks like Mockito can change a class behavior for example, then most likely you're interested in a programming... Source: about 3 years ago
Mock - the response from mock is configured and can vary between runs (like in Mockito). - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Mockito to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Mockito. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.