Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mocki VS Webhook.site

Compare Mocki VS Webhook.site and see what are their differences

Mocki logo Mocki

Using Mocki you can create, run and deploy mock services without hassle. Use your mock services to run tests independent of external services, design APIs and remove backend dependencies for your frontend team.

Webhook.site logo Webhook.site

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
  • Mocki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-03
  • Webhook.site Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScriptโ€“a simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.

What are people using it for?

  • Receive Webhooks without needing an internet-facing Web server
  • Send Webhooks to a server that's behind a firewall or private subnet
  • Transforming Webhooks into other formats, and re-sending them to different systems
  • Connect different APIs that aren't compatible
  • Building contact forms that send emails
  • Instantly build APIs without needing infrastructure

Native integrations include:

  • Google Sheets
  • Dropbox
  • Discord
  • Slack
  • AWS S3 and CloudFront
  • SSH
  • FTP(S)

Mocki

Website
mocki.io
$ Details
free
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform
Release Date
2020 February

Webhook.site

$ Details
freemium $14.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform Python Windows Mac OSX Linux Command Line Interface
Release Date
2016 March

Mocki features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Webhook.site features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Webhook.site provides an extremely user-friendly interface, allowing users to easily create and manage webhook URLs without any technical overhead.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It allows users to monitor incoming HTTP requests in real time, facilitating quick debugging and validation of webhooks.
  • Customization
    Users can customize webhook responses and request headers, making it versatile for various testing scenarios.
  • Temporarily Generated URLs
    Webhook.site generates unique, temporary URLs for testing, which is useful for preventing conflicts and collisions in a multi-user environment.
  • Persistence
    Webhook.site retains the payload data for a certain period, allowing users to review past submissions and data history.
  • Free Tier
    It offers a free tier that is sufficient for basic usage and testing, making it accessible for individual developers and small projects.

Possible disadvantages of Webhook.site

  • Limited Free Features
    The free tier has limitations, such as a cap on the number of requests and retention period, which may not be sufficient for large-scale or extended testing.
  • Data Retention Limits
    Payload data and request logs are stored for a limited time, which might be inconvenient for long-term projects that require persistent data.
  • Security
    While temporary URLs enhance security, there is still some risk involved in exposing potentially sensitive webhook data to a third-party service.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating Webhook.site with certain complex systems may require additional setup and configuration, potentially increasing the initial workload.
  • Feature Limitations
    Advanced features and higher limits are part of the paid plan, which might not be ideal for budget-constrained projects.

Analysis of Webhook.site

Overall verdict

  • Webhook.site is considered a good tool due to its simplicity, ease of use, and immediate utility for developers. It provides a straightforward interface for capturing and analyzing HTTP requests which can significantly streamline the debugging process.

Why this product is good

  • Webhook.site is a useful tool for developers and testers to inspect, test, and debug webhooks. It allows users to create an easily accessible URL where they can send HTTP requests and inspect the payloads and headers. This can be invaluable for testing the integration of third-party services or custom APIs without the complexity of setting up a server.

Recommended for

    Webhook.site is recommended for developers, QA testers, and any IT professionals who need to test or demonstrate webhooks and HTTP requests. It is particularly beneficial for those working with APIs, developing webhook integrations, or setting up automated notification systems.

Mocki videos

No Mocki videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Webhook.site videos

Webhook.site Custom Actions Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mocki and Webhook.site)
Developer Tools
12 12%
88% 88
APIs
13 13%
87% 87
API Tools
16 16%
84% 84
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mocki and Webhook.site. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhook.site seems to be a lot more popular than Mocki. While we know about 79 links to Webhook.site, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Mocki. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mocki mentions (3)

  • 10 Best API Mocking Tools (2024 Review)
    Mocki is an online tool for creating and hosting mock APIs. It offers easy setup for returning specific responses and supports importing/exporting mock configurations and generating random data. As a cloud-based solution, Mocki facilitates collaboration among team members. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Review: 10 Top API Mock Tools
    Mocki is an online tool for creating and hosting mock APIs. It allows you to set up a mock version of your API and configure it to return specific responses to incoming requests. mocki.io is relatively easy to use and has a wide range of features for mocking and simulating APIs, including support for importing and exporting mock configurations, generating random data for responses, and setting up conditional... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Mocki - A tool that lets you create mock GraphQL and REST APIs synced to a GitHub repository. Simple REST APIs are free to create and use without signup. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Webhook.site mentions (79)

  • CDEvents in Action #1: Simulate a Consumer
    # Send a deployment event to your webhook.site URL Curl -X POST https://webhook.site/YOUR-UNIQUE-ID \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "context": { "version": "0.4.1", "id": "test-123", "source": "my-pipeline", "type": "dev.cdevents.service.deployed.0.2.0", "timestamp": "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'" }, "subject": { "id": "my-service", ... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Standing up Debezium Server for Postgres CDC
    A unique URL will be automatically generated for you (it looks like https://webhook.site/XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Solving The Big IAM Challenge
    Okay, letโ€™s think. Since we donโ€™t have access to email, we need to figure out another way to receive a message from the topic. How can we do that? What are the options to receive messages from SNS? We can use the following protocols to communicate with SNS: HTTP, HTTPS, email, email-json, SMS, SQS, application, Lambda, and Firehose. What if we set up an HTTP endpoint to receive messages? Webhooks, here we go!... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Authorization in MCP Server with Permit.io - A JIRA-like Task Management API
    The session token will be sent to a webhook, you can use services such as Webhook.site to receive the session code. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Midjourney Imagine API Application and Usage
    ## Asynchronous Callback Since generating images with Midjourney requires a waiting period, this API is also designed by default for long wait mode. However, in certain scenarios, long waits may incur additional resource overhead, so this API also provides an asynchronous Webhook callback method. When the image generation is successful or fails, the result will be sent to the specified Webhook callback URL via an... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mocki and Webhook.site, you can also consider the following products

WireMock - WireMock - a web service test double for all occasions.

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

MockAPI - MockAPI lets users mock up APIs, generate custom data, and perform operations on it using RESTful interface.

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients

Mockoon - Mockoon is the easiest and quickest way to design and run mock REST APIs. No remote deployment, no account required, free and open-source.

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.