
FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

Podchaser
Rephonic
Listen Notes
Podcast List
Pod Green Room
MillionPodcasts
Podcast Lister
Find, pitch, and book the right podcasts for your clients. Podcast outreach software for PR teams and booking agencies.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | podseeker.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2021 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of mlsql yet.
Podseeker helps PR teams, podcast booking agencies, and experts get booked on the right podcasts. Recommendations by client fit. Start with a client profile and Podseeker recommends podcasts that fit, each with a Client Fit score and a short reason. A database built for outreach. Search by 200+...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Podseeker yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing mlsql and Podseeker.
Podseeker's answer:
Gmail and Microsoft Graph APIs for sending from your own mailbox, hosted on AWS.
Podseeker's answer:
Podseeker is built around fit, not database size. It recommends podcasts for each client by Client Fit, with a fit score and a short reason, and shows booking intelligence on every show: how selective it is, who it books, and recent episodes. Pitches go out from your own Gmail or Outlook, never automatically, and follow-ups stop when a host replies.
Podseeker's answer:
Most podcast tools are either a large database to browse or an automated sender. Podseeker connects the two around one question: which shows would want this guest? You get client-matched recommendations, host and producer contacts, personalized pitching in your own words, and reply-aware follow-ups in one place, for one plan at $99/month with 3 seats. Pitches to very high-fit podcasts booked at 6.2%, compared with 3.3% overall.
Podseeker's answer:
PR agencies, podcast booking agencies, and in-house PR teams who book clients or executives on podcasts every month. Authors, coaches, and consultants who pitch themselves use it too, and developers and AI agents use the Podcast Data API.
Podseeker's answer:
Podseeker started from a simple frustration in podcast PR: most of the time goes into finding the right shows and the right contact, and most pitches go to shows that were never a fit. We built Podseeker to fix the targeting first, then make pitching and follow-up from your own inbox simple. It's independent and bootstrapped, and we build it closely with the PR teams who use it every week.
Share your experience with using mlsql and Podseeker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking Podseeker since Oct 2021.
When comparing mlsql and Podseeker, you can also consider the following products.