
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Perma.cc should be more popular than mlsql. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | perma.cc |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Perma.cc yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using mlsql and Perma.cc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
I think a happy medium is a link shortener that uses https://perma.cc/ for links. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
It seems a lot of people havent heard of it, but I think its worth plugging https://perma.cc/ which is really the appropriate tool for something like Wikipedia to be using to archive pages. Mroe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perma.cc. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I found it valuable to read archive.is owner's blog: https://lj.rossia.org/users/archive_today/ Personally I am finding this situation problematic and am seeking immediate replacement. Wayback Machine seems better but I am thinking of... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
When comparing mlsql and Perma.cc, you can also consider the following products.


Browse through over 150 billion web pages archived from 1996 to a few months ago.
Compare Wayback Machine to mlsql or Perma.cc: