
FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

RegDossier.eu
AI Act Gap
SetAIComply
Vanta
Adeptiv.AI
Reglynn.eu
Article 50 Hub
Free EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Checker — five plain-language questions, instant deterministic result. No account, nothing stored.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | getcomplianceagent.ai |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of mlsql yet.
Self-serve EU AI Act compliance tools. Live now: the EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Checker — free and deterministic. Five plain-language questions, instant on-page result mapping your product to the exact Article 50 obligations and the August 2, 2026 enforcement date. No AI guesswork, no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing mlsql and ComplianceAgent.
ComplianceAgent's answer:
It is free, instant, and specific. Whole-Act scoping tools give you broad orientation; this checker goes deep on Article 50 transparency obligations specifically — and gives you a written result you can keep. No account, no sales calls, nothing stored.
ComplianceAgent's answer:
Any organization that builds or deploys AI systems reaching users in the EU — SMEs, law firms, agencies, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, nonprofits, and government contractors.
ComplianceAgent's answer:
Article 50 transparency obligations apply from August 2, 2026, and most scoping tools cover the whole Act at a shallow level. ComplianceAgent built a free checker that goes deep on Article 50 specifically: five plain-language questions, an instant deterministic result, and nothing stored.
ComplianceAgent's answer:
The checker is a single static page served from Cloudflare. Its logic is fixed rules in plain JavaScript — no AI model, no backend, no database, no login.
ComplianceAgent's answer:
The checker is deterministic — every answer maps to a specific paragraph of EU AI Act Article 50, so the article numbers and dates you see are looked up, not generated by an AI model, and cannot be fabricated. Five plain-language questions, instant on-page result. No account, nothing stored.
Share your experience with using mlsql and ComplianceAgent. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking ComplianceAgent since Mar 2026.
When comparing mlsql and ComplianceAgent, you can also consider the following products.

Communicate with databases like a human
Compare FriendlyData to mlsql or ComplianceAgent:

Eight free EU compliance tools. NIS2 applicability, AI Act risk and fines, DORA assessment, deadline tracker. Article-level citations, no signup.
Compare RegDossier.eu to mlsql or ComplianceAgent: