
FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

VerifyWise.ai
AuditGen.tech
ComplianceAgent
SetAIComply
OneTrust
Adeptiv.AI
Vanta
Free technical gap checker for the EU AI Act. Identifies which artifacts you're missing - not just your risk tier. No login. PDF report included.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | aiactgap.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of mlsql yet.
AI Act Gap is a free technical readiness checker for the EU AI Act. Unlike most free tools that only classify your risk tier, AI Act Gap identifies which specific technical pillars and artifacts you're missing - and tells you exactly what to build to close each gap. The assessment is role-aware...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing mlsql and AI Act Gap.
AI Act Gap's answer:
Next.js 14, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, AWS, Plausible Analytics
AI Act Gap's answer:
Only free tool that gives a technical gap report per pillar, not just a risk classification.
AI Act Gap's answer:
Technical teams, AI Providers and Deployers preparing for EU AI Act compliance.
AI Act Gap's answer:
Most free EU AI Act tools tell you your risk tier and link you to articles. AI Act Gap tells you which technical pillars you're missing and exactly what to build to fix them. It's the only free tool with a downloadable gap report, Article 25 reclassification detection, and an Annex IV artifact checklist — no login, no email required.
AI Act Gap's answer:
AI Act Gap was built by a technical founder who kept seeing the same problem: teams knew they were high-risk under the EU AI Act but had no clear picture of which specific artifacts they were missing. Every free checker stopped at risk classification. AI Act Gap was built to go further — mapping obligations to concrete technical deliverables, verified against the final published text of Regulation EU 2024/1689.
Share your experience with using mlsql and AI Act Gap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking AI Act Gap since Mar 2026.
When comparing mlsql and AI Act Gap, you can also consider the following products.