
FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

RegDossier.eu
Futurepedia.io
ComplianceAgent
There's An AI For That
AI Compliancy.co.uk
AI Tools List
GDPR.EU
Independent directory of 187 AI governance and EU AI Act compliance vendors.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | aiactdirectory.com |
| Company | — | Startup from Italy · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of mlsql yet.
AI Act Directory is an independent, curatorial index of AI governance and EU AI Act compliance tooling. 187 vendors mapped across 10 capability categories (governance platforms, model risk management, monitoring, bias testing, audit, ML explainability, policy management, incident management,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing mlsql and AI Act Directory.
AI Act Directory's answer:
Three things competitors don't combine: complete editorial independence (no pay-to-rank), explicit mapping to specific regulations (not just "AI tools"), and a static, structured-data-first site designed to be cited by both humans and AI assistants.
AI Act Directory's answer:
Generic AI directories like Futurepedia and TheresAnAIForThat list every AI tool without compliance focus. Gartner reports cost €4,000 and update slowly. G2 listings drown in noise and surface pay-to-rank vendors. AI Act Directory is the narrow, deep, free alternative for buyers who specifically need governance, risk, and EU AI Act compliance tooling, organized by what regulation each vendor actually covers.
AI Act Directory's answer:
Compliance officers, CISOs, general counsel, AI ops leads, and procurement teams at organizations subject to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, or ISO 42001. Mostly EU and US-based mid-market and enterprise. Secondary: AI vendors evaluating their own competitive landscape.
AI Act Directory's answer:
EU AI Act enforcement on high-risk AI systems lands 02 August 2026. While building automation tools for industrial PMI, I needed to evaluate compliance platforms and found the discovery process broken: paid placements everywhere, no neutral source, fragmented data across G2, Capterra, Forrester, and individual analyst blogs. So I built the directory I wanted to use.
AI Act Directory's answer:
SvelteKit, Cloudflare Pages, static prerendering, Schema.org structured data, JSON dataset version-controlled in Git.
Share your experience with using mlsql and AI Act Directory. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking AI Act Directory since May 2026.
When comparing mlsql and AI Act Directory, you can also consider the following products.

Communicate with databases like a human
Compare FriendlyData to mlsql or AI Act Directory:

Eight free EU compliance tools. NIS2 applicability, AI Act risk and fines, DORA assessment, deadline tracker. Article-level citations, no signup.
Compare RegDossier.eu to mlsql or AI Act Directory: