
FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

Pabau CRM
Phimetra
Consentz
Fresha
Phorest Salon Software
Zenoti
thefacetapp
Booking, consent and records for UK aesthetic clinics

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | aestheticlinic.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United Kingdom · 1 - 9 employees |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of mlsql yet.
AesthetiClinic is aesthetic clinic software for independent practitioners and multi-practitioner clinics in the United Kingdom and Ireland. It brings online booking, deposits, digital consent forms, patient records, stock control and patient messaging together in one clinic management system,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of AesthetiClinic yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing mlsql and AesthetiClinic.
AesthetiClinic's answer:
SvelteKit, PostgreSQL (Supabase), Stripe for payments, and Cloudflare.
AesthetiClinic's answer:
AesthetiClinic's answer:
It's built only for aesthetic clinics in the UK and Ireland, so the things that matter in aesthetics are in the core rather than bolted on: consent forms patients sign on their own phone, treatment records with product, batch number, dose and injection mapping, deposits into the clinic's own Stripe account with 0% commission to us, and a prescribing workflow for clinics that work with an external prescriber. One plan, £25 + VAT per practitioner a month, with every feature included.
AesthetiClinic's answer:
Three reasons clinics give us. The price is on the page and doesn't climb: one plan, every feature, no contract, no booking fees and no commission on their takings. Switching is done with them, not handed over as a CSV: we map what their current system (AesthetiDocs, Pabau, Faces, Fresha and others) will export before they commit, run the move with them, and nothing goes live until they've checked the records. And it's founder-led: clinics deal directly with the people building it, and most changes they ask for ship within days.
AesthetiClinic's answer:
Independent aesthetic practitioners and small to mid-sized aesthetic clinics in the UK and Ireland: nurse prescribers, doctors and dentists running their own clinics, and non-medical practitioners who work with a prescriber. Clinics either choosing their first proper system or moving from AesthetiDocs, Pabau, Faces, Fresha or a mix of apps and paper forms.
Share your experience with using mlsql and AesthetiClinic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking AesthetiClinic since Sep 2026.
When comparing mlsql and AesthetiClinic, you can also consider the following products.

Communicate with databases like a human
Compare FriendlyData to mlsql or AesthetiClinic:

Clinic and Practice CRM management and booking software.
Compare Pabau CRM to mlsql or AesthetiClinic: