Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MIT Scheme VS Pyjs

Compare MIT Scheme VS Pyjs and see what are their differences

MIT Scheme logo MIT Scheme

Implementation of Scheme providing an interpreter, compiler, source-code debugger, integrated Emacs-like editor, and a large run-time library

Pyjs logo Pyjs

pyjs is a Rich Internet Application (RIA) Development Platform for both Web and Desktop.
  • MIT Scheme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-16
  • Pyjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-07

MIT Scheme features and specs

  • Advanced Features
    MIT Scheme offers advanced language features such as first-class continuations, rich macro facilities, and an extensive runtime library, making it a powerful tool for education and research.
  • Educational Use
    Being designed for educational use, MIT Scheme is well-suited for teaching purposes, especially in introductory computer science courses focusing on functional programming and Scheme itself.
  • GNU License
    Being distributed under the GNU General Public License, MIT Scheme is free software, allowing users to study, modify, and distribute the software with few restrictions.
  • Cross-Platform
    MIT Scheme runs on a variety of platforms, including Unix-like systems and Windows, providing flexibility in choosing an operating system.

Possible disadvantages of MIT Scheme

  • Limited Community
    Compared to more popular languages and Scheme implementations, MIT Scheme has a relatively small user community, which might result in fewer tutorials, examples, and community support.
  • Performance
    While suitable for educational purposes, MIT Scheme might not offer the same level of performance optimization available in other languages or more modern Scheme implementations.
  • Lack of Modern Features
    MIT Scheme may lack some features or conveniences found in newer programming languages or environments, such as extensive IDE support and modern libraries.
  • Complexity
    The advanced features offered may also introduce complexity, making it potentially challenging for beginners not focused on Scheme-specific or functional programming paradigms.

Pyjs features and specs

  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Pyjs allows developers to write a single web application codebase in Python, which can then be compiled into JavaScript. This cross-compilation means the application can run on any device with a web browser, enhancing its reach.
  • Python Syntax
    Developers familiar with Python can leverage their existing knowledge to write web applications without learning JavaScript. This can lead to faster development times and reduced learning curves.
  • Rich Widget Set
    Pyjs offers a rich set of pre-built widgets that can be used to create complex user interfaces easily. This helps in speeding up the development process and ensures consistency across the application.
  • Client-side Execution
    By compiling Python code to JavaScript, Pyjs enables client-side execution of applications, potentially reducing server load and improving user experience through quicker interactions.

Possible disadvantages of Pyjs

  • Performance Overhead
    The extra layer introduced by compiling Python to JavaScript can lead to performance issues, especially for larger applications, as JavaScript is inherently faster and more optimized for web environments.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature frameworks and libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem, Pyjs has a smaller community and fewer resources available, which can pose challenges in terms of finding support and third-party integrations.
  • Debugging Complexity
    Debugging can become complex as developers must understand both the Python source code and the resulting JavaScript output, making it harder to trace and resolve issues.
  • Stagnant Development
    Pyjs has not seen active development or community engagement compared to other frameworks, which could impact its long-term viability and the availability of updates or security patches.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MIT Scheme and Pyjs)
Programming Language
52 52%
48% 48
OOP
52 52%
48% 48
IDE
72 72%
28% 28
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using MIT Scheme and Pyjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pyjs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MIT Scheme mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MIT Scheme yet. Tracking of MIT Scheme recommendations started around Feb 2022.

Pyjs mentions (1)

  • How to actually use python code in browser or application?
    I have a Python program that takes user input from the console and shows some results on the console, and I want the user to be able to type stuff into it instead of pre-recorded runs. How do I do that? I'm not really sure. You could have a copy of Python running on the server and have the front-end communicating with it, but you'd have to be sure it's secured -- there are a lot of dangerous Python commands... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MIT Scheme and Pyjs, you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

Brython - Brython's goal is to replace Javascript with Python, as the scripting language for web browsers.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

TinyScheme - D. Souflis, J. Shapiro - TinyScheme Download site

Transcrypt - Transcrypt is a Python to JavaScript transpiler.

ManKai Common Lisp - ManKai Common Lisp (MKCL) aims to be a full implementation of the Common Lisp language in...