Midnight Commander VS cppq

• User-Friendly Interface
  Midnight Commander provides a text-based user interface that is relatively easy to navigate, unlike traditional command-line interfaces, which can be intimidating for new users.
• Two-pane File Manager
  The dual-pane layout allows users to perform file operations such as moving and copying files between two locations effortlessly.
• Built-in Editor
  Midnight Commander includes a built-in text editor (mcedit) that can be handy for quickly editing configuration files or scripts.
• Connectivity Options
  It supports various network protocols like FTP, SFTP, and Samba, enabling users to manage files on remote systems as easily as on local drives.
• Customizability
  Users can customize key bindings, color schemes, and panels to better suit their needs and workflow preferences.
• Cross-Platform
  Midnight Commander is available on multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, offering a consistent experience across platforms.
• Search Capabilities
  Advanced search options make it easy to find files and text within files, which is useful for a variety of tasks, from coding to administration.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited GUI Features
  Being a text-based application, it lacks some of the graphical features and mouse interactions available in graphical file managers.
• Learning Curve
  While more user-friendly than the command line, it still requires some time to learn and get accustomed to the various key bindings and functionalities.
• Dependency on Terminal
  As a terminal-based application, it requires a terminal emulator, which might not be as efficient or convenient as using a native graphical application for some users.
• Limited Advanced Features
  For complex file management tasks, it may not offer the advanced features or plugins available in more robust file managers.
• No Built-in Preview
  Unlike some graphical file managers, it doesn't provide a built-in preview of files (like images or PDFs), which can be a drawback for certain use cases.
• Dependency on Configuration Files
  Customization often necessitates editing configuration files manually, which could be a deterrent for users who are not comfortable with text-based configurations.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

EzeeLinux Show 18.15 | GNU Midnight Commander

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Emacs 2024 Changes

  Dired as a cross-platform file manager. I used to use Midnight Commander but I found it buggy in the end (on MacOS). Since investing time in learning dired it's good enough. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• OpenBSD Desktop

  Midnight Commander is a good TUI file manager. https://midnight-commander.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Antonmedv/walk: Terminal file manager

  Was there something before https://midnight-commander.org/ or was that the OG? - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.