Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Messagepack

Compare Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Messagepack and see what are their differences

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

Messagepack logo Messagepack

An efficient binary serialization format.
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • Messagepack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Messagepack)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Mobile Apps
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Messagepack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Messagepack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL Server Compact yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL Server Compact recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Messagepack mentions (13)

  • Salt Exporter: the story behind the tool
    I also read that Salt was using MessagePack to format their messages. MessagePack is a format like JSON, but more compact. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • What is the fastest way to encode the arbitrary struct into bytes?
    So appreciate such a detailed reply, thanks. btw, why did you choose tinylib/msgp from 4 available go-impls? Source: over 1 year ago
  • Using Arduino as input to Rust project (help needed)
    If you find you're running the serial connection at maximum speed and it's still not fast enough, try switching to a more compact binary encoding that has both Serde and Arduino implementations, like MsgPack... Though I don't remember enough about its format off the top of my head to tell you the easiest way to put an unambiguous header on each packet/message to make the protocol self-synchronizing. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Java Serialization with Protocol Buffers
    The information can be stored in a database or as files, serialized in a standard format and with a schema agreed with your Data Engineering team. Depending on your information and requirements, it can be as simple as CSV, XML or JSON, or Big Data formats such as Parquet, Avro, ORC, Arrow, or message serialization formats like Protocol Buffers, FlatBuffers, MessagePack, Thrift, or Cap'n Proto. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Multiplayer Networking Solutions
    MessagePack Similar to JSONs, just more compact, although not as much as the ones above. Still, it's usefull to retain some readability in your messages. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Messagepack, you can also consider the following products

UnQLite - UnQLite is a in-process software library which implements a self-contained, serverless...

Protobuf - Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

YAML - YAML 1.2 --- YAML: YAML Ain't Markup Language

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language