Table of contents
Messagepack
An efficient binary serialization format.
As Messagepack is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Pricing:
- Open Source
Efficiency
MessagePack provides efficient binary serialization, which can significantly reduce the size of the data. This makes it faster to transmit over networks and cheaper to store, particularly for large datasets.
Interoperability
MessagePack is supported by a wide variety of programming languages, making it easy to use in polyglot environments or in systems that consist of multiple services using different programming languages.
Simplicity
The MessagePack format is simple to use and understand, comparable to JSON, but it offers better performance and compactness as it uses binary format instead of text.
Flexibility
Supports a variety of data types including integers, floats, strings, arrays, and maps, allowing for complex data structures to be serialized without losing any information.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Messagepack is good.
Check the traffic stats of Messagepack on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Messagepack on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Messagepack's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Messagepack on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Messagepack on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
ImHex will tell you if it's compressed. Do you understand data structures? Floats, all those data types? I'd suggest looking at a format like msgpack to see what a binary data format could look like: https://msgpack.org/ Then be aware that proprietary formats are going to be a lot more complicated. Or maybe it's just zipped up json data, only way to tell is to start poking around at it. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
ARJSON leverages bit-level optimizations to encode JSON at lightning speed while compressing data more efficiently than other self-contained JSON encoding/compression algorithms, such as MessagePack and CBOR. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I also read that Salt was using MessagePack to format their messages. MessagePack is a format like JSON, but more compact. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
So appreciate such a detailed reply, thanks. btw, why did you choose tinylib/msgp from 4 available go-impls? Source: over 3 years ago
If you find you're running the serial connection at maximum speed and it's still not fast enough, try switching to a more compact binary encoding that has both Serde and Arduino implementations, like MsgPack... Though I don't remember enough about its format off the top of my head to tell you the easiest way to put an unambiguous header on each packet/message to make the protocol self-synchronizing. Source: over 3 years ago
The information can be stored in a database or as files, serialized in a standard format and with a schema agreed with your Data Engineering team. Depending on your information and requirements, it can be as simple as CSV, XML or JSON, or Big Data formats such as Parquet, Avro, ORC, Arrow, or message serialization formats like Protocol Buffers, FlatBuffers, MessagePack, Thrift, or Cap'n Proto. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
MessagePack Similar to JSONs, just more compact, although not as much as the ones above. Still, it's usefull to retain some readability in your messages. Source: almost 4 years ago
Upvote for msgpack, one of the great undervalued message protocols available. Source: over 4 years ago
I have two suggestions Capnproto, MessagePack (those are only the two examples that came to mind first, I bet there are even one or two especially developed for rust). Both of these are better than json in nearly every way. Source: over 4 years ago
If you've ever inquired about MessagePack before, you probably know the phrase from its official website, msgpack.org: "It's like JSON, but fast and small." In fact, if you compare how much memory space the same data occupies in JSON and MessagePack, you'll see why the latter is a much more compact format. For example, the number 100 takes 3 bytes in JSON and only 1 in MessagePack. The difference becomes more... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
The viminfo file is written in its one dialect. You can modify it directly if you feel even more adventurous. The shada file use the messagepack format. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
You should probably also check out MessagePack, FlatBuffers, CapnProto etc. Source: almost 5 years ago
For saving the game, I went with MessagePack, which is a binary serialization format. This makes creating the save files much easier: each struct is simply encoded and decoded as-is, except of course for pointers, which have to be restored while deserializing. Source: almost 5 years ago
I've heard of people using firmata or https://msgpack.org or https://github.com/NXPmicro/rpmsg-lite or cbor ... Source: almost 5 years ago
I definitely don't want to program in vimscript but as I understand it, there "MessagePack structured communication enables extensions in any language". Source: over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Messagepack to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Messagepack good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Messagepack here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
