Microlink
CRX Extractor
Ghost Inspector
Jsonlink.io
CloudBrowser.co
Schema API
browserling
BrowserCat
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
Microlink
BuildahBased on our record, Buildah should be more popular than Microlink. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Microlink offers an official MCP integration over a "browser as API" with full Puppeteer/Playwright control and global edge caching. Its volume pricing is the cheapest full-featured Option here โ $49/mo for 46,000 requests (~$1.07/1,000) โ with adblock and cookie-banner handling Available even on the free 50-req/day tier. Best for: high-volume agents that want headless-browser Control and the lowest... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
Microlink's cards [1] I discovered years ago has similar functionality, and microlink itself [2] is much more sophisticated on leveraging a headless chrome. [1]: https://github.com/microlinkhq/cards [2]: https://microlink.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
It's a very basic idea. Few days back, I got to know about this tool named 'microlink' which is a free Browser-as-API sdk. One of its feature was that you provide it a url and it will give you a screenshot of that particular page. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
How do the multiple startups that import YouTube video into their platform work - one's that need the video/audio files? There seems to be a lot of webapps supporting this but I always wondered if they have a goto API for doing this. I myself have used microlink at some points for automated video source extraction. https://microlink.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Metascraper is baked by Microlink, which uses it internally in its browser automation product. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
CRX Extractor - Get any Chrome Extension source code. Learn and hack!
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Ghost Inspector - Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
Jsonlink.io - Link Scrapper API for free. Turn any link into JSON data
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes