
fzf
VS Code
fd
Neovim
Bat
Notepad++
Vim Adventures
Modern terminal-based text editor

NovoPsych
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures by secure link and review scored results, severity bands and reports.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Micro seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 89 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | micro-editor.github.io | clientforms.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Micro yet.
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and DASS-21 by secure link and get scored results, severity bands and reports ready to review. The catalogue also includes DSM-5 ADHD assessments and autism screening tools....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know
More videos
No ClientForms.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Micro and ClientForms.app.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)
ClientForms.app's answer:
Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.
Share your experience with using Micro and ClientForms.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Two more lines worth stealing. Micro as the editor, because I want a terminal editor that behaves like every other text field when I am editing a commit message at 11pm:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Micro editor is a great choice as well imo but I don't think that micro has the thriving plugin ecosystem as compared to neovim but it is possible to make plugins for micro editor as well https://github.com/micro-editor/plugin-channel... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
If you are talking about agents I feel like opencode has gotten pretty good UI/UX If you are talking about a CLI editor, then micro has hit the nail on quality UX https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Tracking ClientForms.app since Dec 2025.
When comparing Micro and ClientForms.app, you can also consider the following products.