Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

micro_httpd VS thttpd

Compare micro_httpd VS thttpd and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

thttpd logo thttpd

thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • thttpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

Analysis of micro_httpd

Overall verdict

  • micro_httpd is a solid, minimalist HTTP server that excels at simplicity and low resource usage, making it a good choice for lightweight, non-critical serving needs, though it lacks the features and performance of full-scale servers.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely small and simple codebase that is easy to audit and understand
  • Runs from inetd/xinetd, so it has essentially no memory footprint when idle
  • Handles basic static file serving, directory listings, and common MIME types
  • Free and open source from a reputable author (Jef Poskanzer of acme.com)
  • Portable and easy to compile on most Unix-like systems

Recommended for

  • Serving simple static websites or files with minimal overhead
  • Embedded systems or resource-constrained environments
  • Educational purposes and learning how a basic HTTP server works
  • Low-traffic internal or hobbyist projects that don't need advanced features
  • Situations where a lightweight server run via inetd/xinetd is preferred over a persistent daemon

micro_httpd videos

No micro_httpd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

thttpd videos

+ Add

DevOps & SysAdmins: thttpd HTTP support level

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to micro_httpd and thttpd)

micro_httpd

thttpd

Web And Application Servers
40 40%
Web And Application Servers
60% 60
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100
Web Browsers
100 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0
VPN
100 100%
VPN
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and thttpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, thttpd seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

thttpd mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing micro_httpd and thttpd, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

HTTP - is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

Caddy - The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Loading...